Belle S H, Seaberg E C, Ganguli M, Ratcliff G, DeKosky S, Kuller L H
University of Pittsburgh, Graduate School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Pa 15261, USA.
Neuroepidemiology. 1996;15(6):321-9. doi: 10.1159/000109922.
The Monongahela Valley Independent Elders Survey (MoVIES) used a multiphase process to identify demented persons among 1,366 randomly selected noninstitutionalized individuals 65 years and older. Raw test scores from a cognitive screening battery were used to identify cognitively impaired individuals who were referred for a clinical evaluation. Subsequently, test scores were adjusted for education and gender within age strata. Adjusting test scores affected sensitivity for dementia only among the most educated, increasing sensitivity among younger subjects and decreasing among the older subjects. Specificity increased among the least educated and the oldest subjects. Overall, the adjusted criteria did not perform as well as the unadjusted criteria in this sample. Adjustment for education will not necessarily improve the ability of a screening battery for cognitive function to identify demented persons, particularly if unadjusted scores perform well.
莫农加希拉河谷独立老年人调查(MoVIES)采用多阶段流程,在1366名随机抽取的65岁及以上非机构化个体中识别出患有痴呆症的人。认知筛查组合的原始测试分数用于识别被转介进行临床评估的认知受损个体。随后,在年龄层内对测试分数进行教育程度和性别的调整。调整测试分数仅在受教育程度最高的人群中影响痴呆症的敏感性,在较年轻受试者中敏感性增加,而在较年长受试者中降低。在受教育程度最低和年龄最大的受试者中,特异性增加。总体而言,在该样本中,调整后的标准表现不如未调整的标准。对教育程度进行调整不一定会提高认知功能筛查组合识别痴呆症患者的能力,特别是在未调整分数表现良好的情况下。