Dodge Hiroko H, Meguro Kenichi, Ishii Hiroshi, Yamaguchi Satoshi, Saxton Judith A, Ganguli Mary
Department of Public Health, College of Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97401, USA.
Int Psychogeriatr. 2009 Feb;21(1):113-22. doi: 10.1017/S1041610208007886. Epub 2008 Oct 17.
The Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) is widely used in Japan and the U.S.A. for cognitive screening in the clinical setting and in epidemiological studies. A previous Japanese community study reported distributions of the MMSE total score very similar to that of the U.S.A.
Data were obtained from the Monongahela Valley Independent Elder's Study (MoVIES), a representative sample of community-dwelling elderly people aged 65 and older living near Pittsburgh, U.S.A., and from the Tajiri Project, with similar aims in Tajiri, Japan. We examined item-by-item distributions of the MMSE between two cohorts, comparing (1) percentage of correct answers for each item within each cohort, and (2) relative difficulty of each item measured by Item Characteristic Curve analysis (ICC), which estimates log odds of obtaining a correct answer adjusted for the remaining MMSE items, demographic variables (age, gender, education) and interactions of demographic variables and cohort.
Median MMSE scores were very similar between the two samples within the same education groups. However, the relative difficulty of each item differed substantially between the two cohorts. Specifically, recall and auditory comprehension were easier for the Tajiri group, but reading comprehension and sentence construction were easier for the MoVIES group.
Our results reaffirm the importance of validation and examination of thresholds in each cohort to be studied when a common instrument is used as a dementia screening tool or for defining cognitive impairment.
简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)在日本和美国被广泛用于临床环境及流行病学研究中的认知筛查。此前一项日本社区研究报告称,MMSE总分的分布与美国非常相似。
数据来自莫农加希拉谷独立老年人研究(MoVIES),该研究是对居住在美国匹兹堡附近的65岁及以上社区老年人的代表性样本,以及来自日本田尻项目,该项目在日本田尻有类似目标。我们检查了两个队列之间MMSE的逐项分布,比较了(1)每个队列中每个项目的正确答案百分比,以及(2)通过项目特征曲线分析(ICC)测量的每个项目的相对难度,该分析估计在调整了其余MMSE项目、人口统计学变量(年龄、性别、教育程度)以及人口统计学变量与队列的相互作用后获得正确答案的对数优势。
在相同教育组中,两个样本的MMSE中位数得分非常相似。然而,两个队列中每个项目的相对难度存在很大差异。具体而言,田尻组的回忆和听觉理解更容易,但MoVIES组的阅读理解和句子构建更容易。
我们的结果再次强调,当使用通用工具作为痴呆筛查工具或用于定义认知障碍时,在每个待研究队列中进行阈值验证和检查的重要性。