Suppr超能文献

《UM-CIDI DSM-III-R 恐惧症的信度与程序效度》

Reliability and procedural validity of UM-CIDI DSM-III-R phobic disorders.

作者信息

Wittchen H U, Zhao S, Abelson J M, Abelson J L, Kessler R C

机构信息

Max-Planck-Institut für Psychiatrie Klinisches Institut, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Psychol Med. 1996 Nov;26(6):1169-77. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700035893.

Abstract

We evaluate the long-term test-retest reliability and procedural validity of phobia diagnoses in the UM-CIDI, the version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview, used in the US National Co-morbidity Survey (NCS) and a number of other ongoing large-scale epidemiological surveys. Test-retest reliabilities of lifetime diagnoses of simple phobia, social phobia, and agoraphobia over a period between 16 and 34 months were K = 0.46, 0.47, and 0.63, respectively. Concordances with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID) were K = 0.45, 0.62, and 0.63, respectively. Diagnostic discrepancies with the SCID were due to the UM-CIDI under-diagnosing. Post hoc analysis demonstrated that modification of UM-CIDI coding rules could dramatically improve cross-sectional procedural validity for both simple phobia (K = 0.57) and social phobia (K = 0.95). Based on these results, it seems likely that future modification of CIDI questions and coding rules could lead to substantial improvements in diagnostic validity.

摘要

我们评估了用于美国国家共病调查(NCS)及其他一些正在进行的大规模流行病学调查的综合国际诊断访谈(CIDI)版本——密歇根-综合国际诊断访谈(UM-CIDI)中恐惧症诊断的长期重测信度和程序效度。在16至34个月期间,单纯恐惧症、社交恐惧症和广场恐惧症终生诊断的重测信度分别为K = 0.46、0.47和0.63。与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)结构化临床访谈(SCID)的一致性分别为K = 0.45、0.62和0.63。与SCID的诊断差异是由于UM-CIDI诊断不足所致。事后分析表明,修改UM-CIDI编码规则可显著提高单纯恐惧症(K = 0.57)和社交恐惧症(K = 0.95)的横断面程序效度。基于这些结果,未来对CIDI问题和编码规则的修改似乎有可能大幅提高诊断效度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验