• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于在小样本临床前研究中评估HIV疫苗效力的对照条件测试。

A control-conditional test for assessing HIV vaccine efficacy in small sample preclinical studies.

作者信息

Albert J M

机构信息

Biostatistics Research Branch, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.

出版信息

Stat Med. 1996;15(21-22):2371-8; discussion 2405-12. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19961115)15:21<2371::AID-SIM456>3.0.CO;2-B.

DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19961115)15:21<2371::AID-SIM456>3.0.CO;2-B
PMID:8931207
Abstract

In this paper, we discuss the analysis of data from small sample animal studies intended to evaluate HIV vaccine efficacy. The focus is on the chimpanzee model with HIV infection, a binary outcome, of primary interest. The problem becomes that of testing for a difference in independent binomial proportions, but aspects of the study design call into question the use of standard approaches. As sample sizes may be as small as one or two per group in this context, it is tempting to utilize previous data; such usage, however, carries a high price in terms of additional assumptions. We present a test, referred to as the control-conditional test, which conditions on the control data and assumes (in a manner of Bayesian estimation) only vague prior information. Comparisons are made with Fisher's exact test and an exact unconditional test. The control-conditional test is also generalized to allow the analysis of data from a differential dose design.

摘要

在本文中,我们讨论了对旨在评估HIV疫苗效力的小样本动物研究数据的分析。重点是感染HIV的黑猩猩模型,这是一个二元结局,是主要关注对象。问题变成了检验独立二项比例差异的问题,但研究设计的一些方面对标准方法的使用提出了质疑。在此背景下,每组样本量可能小至一两个,因此利用先前数据很有吸引力;然而,这种使用在额外假设方面代价高昂。我们提出了一种检验方法,称为对照条件检验,它以对照数据为条件,并(以贝叶斯估计的方式)仅假设模糊的先验信息。将其与费舍尔精确检验和精确无条件检验进行了比较。对照条件检验也进行了推广,以允许分析来自差异剂量设计的数据。

相似文献

1
A control-conditional test for assessing HIV vaccine efficacy in small sample preclinical studies.一种用于在小样本临床前研究中评估HIV疫苗效力的对照条件测试。
Stat Med. 1996;15(21-22):2371-8; discussion 2405-12. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19961115)15:21<2371::AID-SIM456>3.0.CO;2-B.
2
Comparing methods for calculating confidence intervals for vaccine efficacy.比较计算疫苗效力置信区间的方法。
Stat Med. 1996;15(21-22):2379-92. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19961115)15:21<2379::AID-SIM457>3.0.CO;2-L.
3
More enlightenment on the essence of applying Fisher's Exact test when testing for statistical significance using small sample data presented in a 2 x 2 table.关于在使用2×2表格呈现的小样本数据进行统计显著性检验时应用费舍尔精确检验本质的更多启示。
West Afr J Med. 1992 Jul-Sep;11(3):179-84.
4
A more powerful exact test of noninferiority from binary matched-pairs data.一种基于二元匹配对数据的更强大的非劣效性精确检验。
Stat Med. 2008 Aug 15;27(18):3540-9. doi: 10.1002/sim.3229.
5
Basic statistical testing, including interim analysis.
Semin Reprod Endocrinol. 1996 May;14(2):133-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1016321.
6
Formulae and tables for the determination of sample sizes and power in clinical trials for testing differences in proportions for the two-sample design: a review.两样本设计中用于检验比例差异的临床试验样本量和效能测定的公式与表格:综述
Stat Med. 1996 Jan 15;15(1):1-21. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960115)15:1<1::AID-SIM134>3.0.CO;2-E.
7
Asymptotic simultaneous confidence intervals for many-to-one comparisons of binary proportions in randomized clinical trials.随机临床试验中二元比例多对一比较的渐近同时置信区间。
J Biopharm Stat. 2009;19(2):292-310. doi: 10.1080/10543400802622501.
8
Robustness and power of analysis of covariance applied to ordinal scaled data as arising in randomized controlled trials.应用于随机对照试验中出现的有序尺度数据的协方差分析的稳健性和功效。
Stat Med. 2003 Apr 30;22(8):1317-34. doi: 10.1002/sim.1433.
9
Optimal conditional error functions for the control of conditional power.用于控制条件功效的最优条件误差函数。
Biometrics. 2004 Sep;60(3):715-23. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00221.x.
10
Estimating treatment efficacy over time: a logistic regression model for binary longitudinal outcomes.评估随时间变化的治疗效果:用于二元纵向结局的逻辑回归模型
Stat Med. 2005 Sep 30;24(18):2789-805. doi: 10.1002/sim.2147.