Steiner A, Raube K, Stuck A E, Aronow H U, Draper D, Rubenstein L Z, Beck J C
Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of Southampton, UK.
Gerontologist. 1996 Feb;36(1):54-62. doi: 10.1093/geront/36.1.54.
Given that the assessment of multiple dimensions of health/well-being can create respondent burden, assessment scales that are both effective and brief hold great attraction. In this study, we used Cronbach's alpha and correlational methods, including factor analysis, to evaluate the performance of four short scales measuring psychosocial aspects of well-being (depression, quality of life, sense of coherence, social support) in two samples of community-dwelling persons aged 75 and over (n = 414, n = 50). All four scales exhibited good range, high internal consistency, strong temporal reliability, and reasonable levels of construct validity. We conclude that they are practical contributors to measuring health in community-based older adults.
鉴于对健康/幸福的多个维度进行评估可能会给受访者带来负担,兼具有效性和简洁性的评估量表极具吸引力。在本研究中,我们使用克朗巴哈系数和相关方法(包括因子分析),对两个75岁及以上社区居住者样本(n = 414,n = 50)中测量幸福心理社会方面(抑郁、生活质量、连贯感、社会支持)的四个短量表的性能进行了评估。所有四个量表都表现出良好的范围、高内部一致性、强时间可靠性和合理水平的结构效度。我们得出结论,它们是测量社区老年人健康状况的实用工具。