Jones T D, Easterly C E
Health Sciences Research Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee 37831-6101, USA.
Environ Health Perspect. 1996 Oct;104 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):1017-30. doi: 10.1289/ehp.96104s51017.
Relative potencies for 30 compounds scheduled for carcinogenic testing in the 2-year rodent bioassays were estimated based on comparisons with a wide variety of bioassay data for benzo[a]pyrene, nicotine, cisplatin, aflatoxin B1, and cyclophosphamide. Potential for oncogenic transformation of each of the compounds was estimated from short-term bioassays. Promoting strength was assigned on the basis of comparisons of the product of relative potency and test dose with the distribution of similar products obtained for 67 common compounds in the data-base of Gold et al. A potency class for promotion was assigned on the basis of whether the potency-adjusted test dosage was > 2 sigma below the mean, > 1 sigma below the mean, within +/- sigma of the mean, > sigma above the mean, or > 2 sigma above the mean, as determined from the 67 compounds. The underlying hypothesis is that a weak test dose may have a low probability of revealing a potential carcinogen, whereas a strong dose may have a high probability of producing false-positive results. Predictions are therefore directed at the central 68% of the log-normal frequency distribution according to the assumption that +/- sigma represents the ideal test dose.
基于与苯并[a]芘、尼古丁、顺铂、黄曲霉毒素B1和环磷酰胺的大量生物测定数据进行比较,估算了计划在两年期啮齿动物生物测定中进行致癌性测试的30种化合物的相对效力。每种化合物的致癌转化潜力通过短期生物测定进行估算。根据相对效力与测试剂量的乘积与Gold等人数据库中67种常见化合物获得的类似乘积分布进行比较,确定促进强度。根据从67种化合物中确定的效力调整后的测试剂量是低于平均值2个标准差、低于平均值1个标准差、在平均值的±1个标准差范围内、高于平均值1个标准差还是高于平均值2个标准差,为促进作用指定一个效力类别。基本假设是,低强度测试剂量可能揭示潜在致癌物的概率较低,而高强度剂量可能产生假阳性结果的概率较高。因此,根据±1个标准差代表理想测试剂量的假设,预测针对对数正态频率分布的中间68%。