• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Four different core materials measured for fracture strength in combination with five different designs of endodontic posts.

作者信息

Cohen B I, Pagnillo M K, Condos S, Deutsch A S

机构信息

Essential Dental Systems, South Hackensack, N.J., USA.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 1996 Nov;76(5):487-95. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(96)90006-2.

DOI:10.1016/s0022-3913(96)90006-2
PMID:8933438
Abstract

The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the fractural load of four core materials supported by five post designs. This study was divided into 20 groups with 10 samples per group. Specimens were placed in a special jig at a 45-degree angle, and the fracture load values, in pounds, were obtained with the use of a universal testing machine. A 5 x 4 factorial design was used to assess and compare the fractural strength, and a two-way analysis of variance was used to determine whether the buccolingual, mesiodistal, and height dimensions differed across groupings. Mean fracture load values were obtained. Flexi-Post dowel/Ti-Core material at 277.1 pounds and ParaPost dowel/ Tytin silver amalgam at 277.3 pounds recorded the greatest mean values. These values were not statistically different. ParaPost dowel/Ketac-Silver material had the lowest mean value (49.6 pounds). For all posts Tytin silver amalgam and Ti-Core material were significantly stronger than Ketac-Silver and G-C Miracle Mix material. Ketac-Silver and G-C Miracle Mix materials did not differ from each other. Results indicated that Ti-Core composite material is at least as strong as Tytin silver amalgam.

摘要

相似文献

1
Four different core materials measured for fracture strength in combination with five different designs of endodontic posts.
J Prosthet Dent. 1996 Nov;76(5):487-95. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(96)90006-2.
2
Fracture strength of three different core materials in combination with three different endodontic posts.
Int J Prosthodont. 1994 Mar-Apr;7(2):178-82.
3
Cyclic fatigue testing of five endodontic post designs supported by four core materials.
J Prosthet Dent. 1997 Nov;78(5):458-64. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(97)70060-x.
4
In vitro evaluation of five core materials.五种核心材料的体外评估
J Prosthodont. 2007 Jan-Feb;16(1):25-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2006.00149.x.
5
Fracture strengths of three core restorative materials supported with or without a prefabricated split-shank post.
J Prosthet Dent. 1997 Dec;78(6):560-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(97)70006-4.
6
Retention of three endodontic posts cemented with five dental cements.
J Prosthet Dent. 1998 May;79(5):520-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70172-6.
7
Retention of a core material supported by three post head designs.由三种桩头设计支撑的核心材料的固位
J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Jun;83(6):624-8.
8
Effect of an adhesive resin luting agent on the dowel-head retention of three different core materials.一种粘结树脂粘结剂对三种不同核材料桩头固位力的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2005 May;93(5):439-45. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.02.025.
9
Fracture resistance of five pin-retained core build-up materials on teeth with and without extracoronal preparation.五种桩核修复材料在有或无冠外预备的牙齿上的抗折性
Oper Dent. 2000 Sep-Oct;25(5):388-94.
10
Torsional resistance of crowns cemented to composite cores involving three stainless steel endodontic post designs.三种不锈钢根管桩设计的复合树脂核粘固冠的抗扭转性能
J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Jul;84(1):38-42. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2000.107915.

引用本文的文献

1
A randomized controlled twelve month clinical study on the evaluation of success rate of endodontically treated teeth restored with metal poly-fiber posts and dentin posts.一项为期 12 个月的随机对照临床试验,旨在评估用金属聚纤维桩和牙本质桩修复的根管治疗后牙齿的成功率。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2022 Jan-Mar;22(1):38-47. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_134_21.
2
An In Vitro Study Comparing the Diametral Tensile Strength of Composite Core Build-Up Material With Three Different Prefabricated Post Systems.一项体外研究:比较复合树脂核桩修复材料与三种不同预成桩系统的直径拉伸强度
Cureus. 2022 Sep 25;14(9):e29560. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29560. eCollection 2022 Sep.
3
Structural integrity of extracted teeth restored using three different post-and-core systems: An in vitro comparative study.
使用三种不同桩核系统修复离体牙的结构完整性:一项体外比较研究。
Saudi Dent J. 2021 Feb;33(2):63-68. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.01.007. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
4
Effect of Two Different Surface Treatments on Retention of Cosmopost with Two Different Core Materials.两种不同表面处理对两种不同核材料的Cosmospost固位力的影响。
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2020 Mar 30;12:87-100. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S236323. eCollection 2020.
5
All about Dowels - A Review Part I. Considerations before Cementation.关于桩核的综述——第一部分:粘结前的考量
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Aug;11(8):ZG06-ZG11. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/26472.10518. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
6
Fracture resistances of zirconia, cast Ni-Cr, and fiber-glass composite posts under all-ceramic crowns in endodontically treated premolars.根管治疗后前磨牙全瓷冠修复下氧化锆桩、铸造镍铬合金桩及玻璃纤维复合桩的抗折性能
J Adv Prosthodont. 2017 Jun;9(3):170-175. doi: 10.4047/jap.2017.9.3.170. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
7
An assessment of fracture resistance of three composite resin core build-up materials on three prefabricated non-metallic posts, cemented in endodontically treated teeth: an in vitro study.三种复合树脂核修复材料在三种预制非金属桩上的抗折强度评估:一项体外研究。
PeerJ. 2015 Feb 24;3:e795. doi: 10.7717/peerj.795. eCollection 2015.
8
Finite element analysis of adhesive endo-crowns of molars at different height levels of buccally applied load.不同颊侧加载高度下磨牙粘结式内冠的有限元分析
J Dent Biomech. 2012;3:1758736012455421. doi: 10.1177/1758736012455421. Epub 2012 Aug 3.