Jackson L A, Alexander E R, DeBolt C A, Swenson P D, Boase J, McDowell M G, Reeves M W, Wenger J D
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle 98195-7236, USA.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1996 Nov;15(11):992-8. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199611000-00012.
A vaccine for prevention of serogroup B meningococcal disease is not available in the United States, and indications for the use of mass chemoprophylaxis for control of meningococcal outbreaks are not well-defined. In response to an outbreak of six cases of enzyme type 5 serogroup B meningococcal disease among students at a middle school, we implemented a program of mass rifampin prophylaxis and evaluated the effectiveness of this preventive measure.
Oropharyngeal cultures were obtained from 351 of the 900 students before prophylaxis; 196 participants were recultured 3 weeks later. Meningococcal isolates were subtyped and tested for rifampin susceptibility, and risk factors for disease or carriage among students were evaluated.
No cases occurred after prophylaxis. Before prophylaxis 10% (34 of 351) of students were meningococcal carriers and 3.4% (12 of 351) carried the epidemic strain. After prophylaxis 2.5% (5 of 196) were carriers and 1.0% (2 of 196) carried the epidemic strain. Rifampin was 85% effective in eradicating carriage, and the rate of acquisition of carriage during the 3-week period was low (0.5%). Carriage persisted after prophylaxis in 4 students; 3 of these postprophylaxis isolates were rifampin-resistant. Rifampin resistance thus developed in 12% (3 of 26) of preprophylaxis isolates. Disease/epidemic strain carriage was associated with enrollment in the school band and certain other classes.
These findings suggests that mass chemoprophylaxis may be effective and should be considered for control of school serogroup B meningococcal outbreaks. This approach is less likely to be effective for control of outbreaks affecting larger, less well-defined populations and is associated with the rapid development of antibiotic resistance.
美国尚无预防B群脑膜炎球菌病的疫苗,且大规模化学预防用于控制脑膜炎球菌病暴发的指征尚不明确。针对一所中学学生中发生的6例5型酶B群脑膜炎球菌病暴发,我们实施了大规模利福平预防计划,并评估了这一预防措施的效果。
在预防前从900名学生中的351名获取口咽培养物;3周后对196名参与者再次培养。对脑膜炎球菌分离株进行亚型分型并检测其对利福平的敏感性,评估学生中疾病或带菌的危险因素。
预防后未出现病例。预防前10%(351名中的34名)的学生为脑膜炎球菌携带者,3.4%(351名中的12名)携带流行菌株。预防后2.5%(196名中的5名)为携带者,1.0%(196名中的2名)携带流行菌株。利福平清除带菌的有效率为85%,3周期间带菌获得率较低(<0.5%)。4名学生在预防后仍持续带菌;这些预防后分离株中有3株对利福平耐药。因此,预防前分离株中有12%(26株中的3株)出现利福平耐药。疾病/流行菌株携带与参加学校乐队及某些其他班级有关。
这些结果表明,大规模化学预防可能有效,对于控制学校B群脑膜炎球菌病暴发应予以考虑。这种方法对于控制影响更大、定义更不明确人群的暴发可能效果较差,且与抗生素耐药性的快速产生有关。