A comparison of the anti-idiotypic responses generated by antibodies to a protein and a hapten: a common interspecies idiotype on antibodies against human albumin induces an idiotypic network in rabbits.

Idiotypic networks have the capacity to exert significant influences on immune responses and an understanding of the ways to manipulate these networks may lead to new modalities in immunotherapy. In order to gain further insights into the nature of the immune responses stimulated by immunoglobulin idiotypes, rabbits were immunized with a mAb (Ab1) against a large globular protein, human albumin, or a mAb against a hapten, TNP. All rabbits developed anti-idiotypic antibodies (Ab2) and the rabbits immunized with anti-human albumin concomitantly developed antibodies to human albumin (Ab3). Ab2 prepared from these rabbits blocked binding of Ab1 to antigen and the anti-human albumin Ab2 reacted with all species of anti-human albumin including sheep, rabbit, rat and goat. The anti-TNP Ab2 reacted only with the mouse anti-TNP Ab1. This TNP Ab2 bound only to intact Ab1 whereas the human albumin Ab2 reacted with the Ab1 heavy chain. To compare the relative efficiencies of anti-idiotypic antibodies and antigen in inducing antibody, mice were immunized with rabbit Ab2 or antigen. All mice immunized with Ab2 developed anti-idiotypic Ab3, but only the human albumin Ab2 preparations elicited antigen specific Ab3; the amount of antibody produced was less than 1% of that found by immunization with antigen. The type of antibody induced in the Ab2-immunized mice was compared with that found in the antigen-immunized mice and in the Ab1-immunized rabbits. The mouse anti-albumin Ab3 was comparable to mouse Ab1 in terms of affinity and specificity for proteolytic fragments of human albumin. The Ab3 which arose in Ab1-immunized rabbits had a higher affinity and broader epitope specificity and was similar to antibodies raised against antigen. These results show considerable differences in the ability of similar anti-idiotypic antibodies to induce immune responses as well as considerable differences in the nature of a response seen within an intact network compared to an artificially induced network.