Suppr超能文献

刺激控制干预对大学健身中心出勤率的影响。

Effect of a stimulus control intervention on attendance at a university fitness center.

作者信息

Estabrooks P A, Courneya K S, Nigg C R

机构信息

Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Behav Modif. 1996 Apr;20(2):202-15. doi: 10.1177/01454455960202004.

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to determine the isolated effects of stimulus control on attendance at a fitness facility. Participants were members of a university fitness club randomly assigned to control (n = 50), placebo (n = 50), and stimulus control (n = 100) conditions. The control condition received no intervention, the placebo condition received a letter by mail, and the stimulus control condition received the same letter by mail plus a complimentary "EXERCISE" key chain, which was to act as the stimulus control. Attendance was monitored surreptitiously for 5 weeks baseline and 8 weeks postintervention by using the facility's computer system. A manipulation check found that 48 of the 100 participants used the key chain. Therefore, analyses were conducted separately for "intention to treat" and "actual treatment" conditions. Repeated measures multivariate analyses of variance revealed no main or interaction effects involving experimental condition in either the "intention to treat" or "actual treatment" analyses. Discussion focused on explanations for why the stimulus control intervention was not successful, and directions for future research were provided.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定刺激控制对健身设施出勤情况的单独影响。参与者是大学健身俱乐部的成员,他们被随机分配到控制组(n = 50)、安慰剂组(n = 50)和刺激控制组(n = 100)。控制组未接受任何干预,安慰剂组收到一封邮寄信件,刺激控制组收到同样的邮寄信件外加一个免费的“锻炼”钥匙链,该钥匙链作为刺激控制手段。在基线期使用该健身设施的计算机系统对出勤情况进行了5周的秘密监测,并在干预后进行了8周的监测。一项操纵性检验发现,100名参与者中有48人使用了钥匙链。因此,分别针对“意向性分析”和“实际治疗”情况进行了分析。重复测量多元方差分析显示,在“意向性分析”或“实际治疗”分析中,均未发现涉及实验条件的主效应或交互效应。讨论集中在刺激控制干预未成功的原因解释上,并提供了未来研究的方向。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验