Watson C G, Vangerpen C
J Clin Psychol. 1977 Jul;33(3):630-4. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(197707)33:3<630::aid-jclp2270330306>3.0.co;2-8.
Variations in responsivity to primary, secondary asocial and interpersonal rewards and punishments between major schizophrenic subgroups were investigated in a probability learning study. The subgroups compared were process and reactive, paranoid and nonparanoid, long- and short-hospitalization, and long- and short-length of illness schizophrenics. No evidence of differential responsivity to these reward-punishment/modality combinations appeared between high and low scorers on any of the four schizophrenic subgrouping dimensions. The groups then were matched closely so that the effects of each individual difference measure could be evaluated independently of the other three. Again, no significant differences in responsiveness to the reinforcement/modality combinations appeared. The results do not support the view that any of the four dimensions relate to differential responsiveness to primary, secondary asocial or verbal reward or punishment--at least on relatively simple tasks.
在一项概率学习研究中,调查了主要精神分裂症亚组之间对主要、次要非社会性和人际奖励及惩罚的反应性差异。所比较的亚组包括过程型和反应型、偏执型和非偏执型、住院时间长和短的,以及病程长和短的精神分裂症患者。在四个精神分裂症亚组分类维度中的任何一个维度上,高得分者和低得分者之间均未出现对这些奖励 - 惩罚/方式组合的反应性差异的证据。然后将这些组进行紧密匹配,以便可以独立于其他三个差异测量来评估每个个体差异测量的效果。同样,对强化/方式组合的反应性也未出现显著差异。结果不支持以下观点:这四个维度中的任何一个都与对主要、次要非社会性或言语奖励或惩罚的差异反应性相关——至少在相对简单的任务上是这样。