Watson C G
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1976 Nov;163(5):334-40. doi: 10.1097/00005053-197611000-00006.
Attempts to determine whether the quality of schizophrenic thought disorder varies from one type of schizophrenic to another in earlier studies have been hindered by the contamination of the major individual difference dimensions with each other. In the project described here, partial correlations were run between each of two abstraction deficit measures (Proverbs Test Abstract Level and Autism scores) and four independent variables which represent dimensions commonly used as criteria in individual differences research in schizophrenia--Ullmann-Giovannoni Process-Reactive scores, the MMPI Paranoia Scale, length of illness, and length of hospitalization. In each correlation the three noncriterion individual difference measures, the unused abstraction measure, age, education, and WAIS Vocabulary were partialed out. The correlations were also corrected for attenuation. After partialing, level of abstraction was negatively correlated with processness. Autism was positively related to reactiveness and length of hospitalization. Neither of two paranoid/nonparanoid measures used nor length of illness was related to either dependent variable.
在早期研究中,试图确定精神分裂症思维障碍的质量是否因精神分裂症的类型不同而有所差异,这受到主要个体差异维度相互干扰的阻碍。在此处描述的项目中,对两种抽象缺陷测量指标(谚语测试抽象水平和孤独症得分)中的每一项与四个自变量进行了偏相关分析,这四个自变量代表了在精神分裂症个体差异研究中常用作标准的维度——乌尔曼 - 乔瓦诺尼过程 - 反应性得分、明尼苏达多相人格调查表偏执量表、病程长度和住院时间长度。在每次相关分析中,排除了三个非标准个体差异测量指标、未使用的抽象测量指标、年龄、教育程度和韦氏成人智力量表词汇量。相关系数也进行了衰减校正。排除干扰因素后,抽象水平与过程性呈负相关。孤独症与反应性和住院时间长度呈正相关。所使用的两种偏执/非偏执测量指标以及病程长度均与任何一个因变量无关。