Bowman M A, Haynes R A, Rivo M L, Killian C D, Davis P H
Department of Family Practice and Community Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Fam Med. 1996 Nov-Dec;28(10):713-9.
This study provides information on student factors associated with a career choice in family practice.
Information was used from multiple surveys completed by medical students, including the Premedical Questionnaire, the Matriculating Student Questionnaire, and the Graduation Questionnaire, as well as information from residency directors about residents in the Graduate Medical Education Tracking Census. These questionnaires are all a part of the Student and Applicant Information Management System of the Association of American Medical Colleges. Participants were 30,789 students graduating from US medical schools in 1991 and 1992. Comparisons were made between longitudinal student responses on the surveys to four types of outcomes.
A total of 1,029 (3.3%) students were in the "Maintained" group (students who originally planned to enter family practice and were in a family practice residency at postgraduate year 1; 1,958 (6.4%) were "Gained" (originally chose a specialty other than family practice but entered a family practice residency); 1,950 (6.3%) were "Lost Interest" (originally identified family practice but entered another residency-two thirds of whom selected non-primary care specialties); 21,573 (70.1%) were "Never Interested" (did not express an early interest nor select a family practice residency); and the remainder (13.9%) had incomplete specialty data. Of those originally interested in family practice, 34.5% entered family practice residencies. Only 8.3% of those not originally interested entered family practice residencies. The four groups of students differed on many demographic, attitudinal, and experiential characteristics. Prestige, income, opportunities for research, and faculty status were more important to future specialists, while emphasis on primary care and prevention and practice in smaller communities were more important to the future family physicians.
Medical schools could potentially increase the number of students selecting family practice residencies through both admissions policies and medical school experiences. These data provide some specifics on how to recruit students and prevent loss of those originally interested in family practice.
本研究提供了与家庭医学职业选择相关的学生因素信息。
使用了医学生完成的多项调查问卷中的信息,包括医学预科问卷、入学学生问卷和毕业问卷,以及来自住院医师培训主任关于毕业后医学教育跟踪普查中住院医师的信息。这些问卷都是美国医学院协会学生和申请人信息管理系统的一部分。参与者为1991年和1992年从美国医学院毕业的30789名学生。对学生在调查中的纵向回答与四种类型的结果进行了比较。
共有1029名(3.3%)学生属于“维持组”(最初计划进入家庭医学领域且在研究生一年级时进入家庭医学住院医师培训项目的学生);1958名(6.4%)为“获得组”(最初选择了家庭医学以外的专业但进入了家庭医学住院医师培训项目);1950名(6.3%)为“失去兴趣组”(最初确定选择家庭医学但进入了另一个住院医师培训项目,其中三分之二选择了非初级保健专业);21573名(70.1%)为“从未感兴趣组”(未表达早期兴趣也未选择家庭医学住院医师培训项目);其余(13.9%)的专业数据不完整。在最初对家庭医学感兴趣的学生中,34.5%进入了家庭医学住院医师培训项目。在最初不感兴趣的学生中,只有8.3%进入了家庭医学住院医师培训项目。这四组学生在许多人口统计学、态度和经历特征方面存在差异。声望、收入、研究机会和教师地位对未来专科医生更为重要,而对初级保健和预防的重视以及在较小社区的执业对未来家庭医生更为重要。
医学院校有可能通过招生政策和医学院经历增加选择家庭医学住院医师培训项目的学生数量。这些数据提供了一些关于如何招收学生以及防止原本对家庭医学感兴趣的学生流失的确切信息。