Garne J P, Aspegren K, Balldin G
Department of Surgery, Malmö University Hospital, University of Lund, Sweden.
Acta Oncol. 1996;35(6):671-5. doi: 10.3109/02841869609083997.
The validity of registered official cause of death (COD) concerning breast cancer patients in Malmö 1964-1992 was analysed. There was a high frequency of autopsy in the material and, therefore, the number of diagnostic errors should be low. Found discordance thus mostly reflect the quality of certifying and registration of COD. Of 2631 deaths discordance was found as to underlying COD in 121 cases (4.6%). Ninety-four of these represent outright errors. In 27 there was doubt about the reported COD. The number of discordant cases increased with age at death. Two kinds of systematic bias were found. One was a tendency to report breast cancer as contributing COD in patients with clinical cure. The other was a practice at the Registry to register breast cancer as underlying COD in cases with breast cancer reported as contributing COD. This practice was changed in 1981 causing an artificial decrease in registered breast cancer mortality.
分析了1964年至1992年马尔默乳腺癌患者登记的官方死因(COD)的有效性。该材料中的尸检频率很高,因此诊断错误的数量应该很少。因此,发现的不一致情况大多反映了COD认证和登记的质量。在2631例死亡病例中,有121例(4.6%)的根本死因存在不一致。其中94例为明显错误。27例对报告的COD存在疑问。不一致病例的数量随着死亡年龄的增加而增加。发现了两种系统性偏差。一种是倾向于将乳腺癌报告为临床治愈患者的促成死因。另一种是登记处的做法,即在报告乳腺癌为促成死因的病例中,将乳腺癌登记为根本死因。这种做法在1981年发生了变化,导致登记的乳腺癌死亡率人为下降。