Rutqvist L E
Acta Radiol Oncol. 1985 Sep-Oct;24(5):385-90. doi: 10.3109/02841868509134405.
The accuracy of the cause of death certification was surveyed in 802 breast carcinoma patients reported to the Swedish Cancer Registry from Stockholm county during 1961-1963. A total of 502 deaths occurred during the follow-up period of which 484 were eligible for the analysis. In 7 per cent the officially recorded underlying cause of death failed to accurately reflect the cancer status at death, which was mostly due to diagnostic errors or errors in the coding of the death certificate data. There seemed to be a net overestimation of intercurrent deaths in the official mortality statistics and a corresponding net underestimation of breast carcinoma deaths. Breast carcinoma was mentioned as a contributory cause of death in only 52 per cent of those certified to have died from intercurrent causes but who had recurrent disease at death. Among those with breast carcinoma as a certified contributory cause, 52 per cent did not have recurrent disease according to the clinical records. It is therefore concluded that official data on breast carcinoma as a contributory cause of death are of limited use in descriptive epidemiology.
对1961年至1963年期间向瑞典癌症登记处报告的来自斯德哥尔摩县的802例乳腺癌患者的死亡原因认证准确性进行了调查。在随访期间共发生502例死亡,其中484例符合分析条件。在7%的病例中,官方记录的根本死因未能准确反映死亡时的癌症状况,这主要是由于诊断错误或死亡证明数据编码错误。官方死亡率统计中似乎存在对并发死亡的净高估以及对乳腺癌死亡的相应净低估。在那些被证明死于并发疾病但死亡时有复发性疾病的患者中,只有52%的死亡证明提到乳腺癌是死亡的一个促成原因。在那些经认证乳腺癌为促成死因的患者中,根据临床记录,52%没有复发性疾病。因此得出结论,关于乳腺癌作为死亡促成原因的官方数据在描述性流行病学中的用途有限。