Ewalenko P, Janny S, Dejonckheere M, Andry G, Wyns C
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Institut Jules Bordet, Tumour Centre, Brussels Free University, Belgium.
Br J Anaesth. 1996 Oct;77(4):463-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/77.4.463.
Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are unpleasant, often underestimated side effects of anaesthesia and surgery, not devoid of medical complications. Prevention with antiemetics is only partially effective. Propofol has been shown recently to possess antiemetic properties in several situations. In this prospective, randomized, controlled trial, we have compared the antiemetic efficacy of subhypnotic doses of propofol, with Intralipid as placebo, after thyroidectomy. We studied 64 patients of both sexes, aged 22-71 yr, ASA I or II, undergoing thyroidectomy. After premedication with a benzodiazepine, balanced anaesthesia was produced with isoflurane and nitrous oxide in oxygen, and supplementary analgesia with fentanyl i.v. as required. Postoperative analgesia was provided with non-opioids, and piritramide 0.25 mg kg-1 i.m. on demand. Patients were allocated randomly and blindly to receive a 20-h infusion of either propofol or 10% Intralipid 0.1 ml kg-1 h-1. Intralipid, the excipient of propofol, was chosen as placebo as it is devoid of antiemetic effects. Sedation scores, respiratory and cardiovascular variables, and incidence of PONV were assessed every 4 h for 24 h. Pulse oximetry and ECG were monitored continuously. Both groups were comparable in characteristics, surgical and anaesthesia procedures, amount of opioids given during and after operation, and total amount of the study drug infused after operation. Occurrence of PONV was similar before the start (propofol 41%, Intralipid 50%) and after completion (propofol 0.64%, Intralipid 1.6%) of infusion and decreased with time in both groups during the infusion. However, symptoms were reduced to nil with propofol but persisted and were more severe with Intralipid during infusion (P < or = 0.01). The overall incidence of PONV during infusion was 10% (three of 32 patients) in the propofol group and 65% (21 of 32 patients) in the Intralipid group. Cardiovascular and respiratory variables, and SpO2 were unaltered, and sedation decreased similarly with time in both groups. We conclude that propofol, given at subhypnotic doses, effectively reduced the incidence of PONV without untoward sedative or cardiovascular effects.
术后恶心呕吐(PONV)是麻醉和手术中令人不适且常被低估的副作用,并非没有医学并发症。使用止吐药预防仅部分有效。最近研究表明丙泊酚在多种情况下具有止吐特性。在这项前瞻性、随机、对照试验中,我们比较了甲状腺切除术后亚催眠剂量丙泊酚与作为安慰剂的脂质乳剂的止吐效果。我们研究了64例年龄在22 - 71岁、ASA I或II级、接受甲状腺切除术的男女患者。在给予苯二氮䓬类药物进行术前用药后,用异氟烷和氧化亚氮在氧气中进行平衡麻醉,并根据需要静脉注射芬太尼进行辅助镇痛。术后镇痛采用非阿片类药物,并按需肌内注射0.25 mg/kg的匹利卡明。患者被随机、盲法分配接受20小时的丙泊酚输注或10%脂质乳剂0.1 ml/kg·h - 1的输注。脂质乳剂作为丙泊酚的辅料,因其没有止吐作用而被选作安慰剂。在24小时内每4小时评估一次镇静评分、呼吸和心血管变量以及PONV的发生率。持续监测脉搏血氧饱和度和心电图。两组在特征、手术和麻醉程序、手术期间和术后给予的阿片类药物量以及术后输注的研究药物总量方面具有可比性。在输注开始前(丙泊酚组41%,脂质乳剂组50%)和结束后(丙泊酚组0.64%,脂质乳剂组1.6%)PONV的发生率相似,且在输注期间两组均随时间下降。然而,丙泊酚组症状减轻至无,但脂质乳剂组在输注期间症状持续且更严重(P≤0.01)。输注期间PONV的总体发生率在丙泊酚组为10%(32例患者中的3例),在脂质乳剂组为65%(32例患者中的21例)。心血管和呼吸变量以及SpO2未改变,两组镇静程度均随时间类似下降。我们得出结论,亚催眠剂量的丙泊酚可有效降低PONV的发生率,且无不良镇静或心血管作用。