Levine K, Huang K, Cross F R
The Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10021, USA.
Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Dec;16(12):6794-803. doi: 10.1128/MCB.16.12.6794.
The three budding yeast CLN genes appear to be functionally redundant for cell cycle Start: any single CLN gene is sufficient to promote Start, while the cln1 cln2 cln3 triple mutant is Start defective and inviable. Both quantitative and apparently qualitative differences between CLN genes have been reported, but available data do not in general allow distinction between qualitative functional differences as opposed to simply quantitative differences in expression or function. To determine if there are intrinsic qualitative differences between Cln proteins, we compared CLN2, CLN3, and crippled (but still partially active) CLN2 genes in a range of assays that differentiate genetically between CLN2 and CLN3. The results suggest that different potencies of Cln2, Cln3, and Cln2 mutants in functional assays cannot be accounted for by a simple quantitative model for their action, since Cln3 is at least as active as Cln2 and much more active than the Cln2 mutants in driving Swi4/Swi6 cell cycle box (SCB)-regulated transcription and cell cycle initiation in cln1 cln2 cln3 bck2 strains, but Cln3 has little or no activity in other assays in which Cln2 and the Cln2 mutants function. Differences in Cln protein abundance are unlikely to account for these results. Cln3-associated kinase is therefore likely to have an intrinsic in vivo substrate specificity distinct from that of Cln2-associated kinase, despite their functional redundancy. Consistent with the idea that Cln3 may be the primary transcriptional activator of CLN1, CLN2, and other genes, the activation of CLN2 transcription was found to be sensitive to the gene dosage of CLN3 but not to the gene dosage of CLN2.
对于细胞周期起始,酿酒酵母的三个CLN基因在功能上似乎是冗余的:任何单个CLN基因都足以促进起始,而cln1 cln2 cln3三突变体则存在起始缺陷且无法存活。已有报道称CLN基因之间存在数量上以及明显的质量上的差异,但现有数据总体上无法区分质量上的功能差异与仅仅是表达或功能上的数量差异。为了确定Cln蛋白之间是否存在内在的质量差异,我们在一系列能从基因上区分CLN2和CLN3的实验中,比较了CLN2、CLN3以及有缺陷(但仍有部分活性)的CLN2基因。结果表明,在功能实验中,Cln2、Cln3和Cln2突变体的不同效能无法用一个简单的作用定量模型来解释,因为在cln1 cln2 cln3 bck2菌株中驱动Swi4/Swi6细胞周期框(SCB)调控的转录和细胞周期起始时,Cln3至少与Cln2一样活跃,且比Cln2突变体活跃得多,但在Cln2和Cln2突变体起作用的其他实验中,Cln3几乎没有或没有活性。Cln蛋白丰度的差异不太可能解释这些结果。因此,尽管Cln3和Cln2功能冗余,但Cln3相关激酶可能具有与Cln2相关激酶不同的内在体内底物特异性。与Cln3可能是CLN1、CLN2和其他基因的主要转录激活因子这一观点一致,发现CLN2转录的激活对CLN3的基因剂量敏感,而对CLN2的基因剂量不敏感。