Suppr超能文献

婴儿运动:针对色彩定义和亮度定义的移动刺激的检测(M:D)比率。

Infant motion: detection (M:D) ratios for chromatically defined and luminance-defined moving stimuli.

作者信息

Dobkins K R, Teller D Y

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle 98195, USA.

出版信息

Vision Res. 1996 Oct;36(20):3293-310. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(96)00069-7.

Abstract

In order to assess the relative contributions of chromatic vs luminance information to motion processing in infants, we employed a motion:detection (M:D) paradigm. Stimuli consisted of 27 deg by 40 deg, 0.25 c/deg sinusoidal gratings moving at 22 deg/sec (5.6 Hz), and were either chromatically defined or luminance-defined. Contrast thresholds for direction-of-motion (M) were obtained using a directional eye movement technique. Contrast thresholds for detection (D) were obtained using forced-choice preferential looking. M:D threshold ratios were obtained for individual infant subjects, and results were compared to those of adults. As expected, adult M:D threshold ratios were near 1:1 for luminance-defined stimuli, but greater than 1:1 for chromatically defined stimuli. This suggests that, for adults, luminance-defined, but not chromatically defined, stimuli are detected by mechanisms labeled for direction of motion. By contrast, infant M:D ratios for chromatically and luminance-defined stimuli were approximately equal and close to 1:1, suggesting that, for infants, luminance- as well as chromatically defined stimuli are detected by mechanisms that are labeled for direction of motion.

摘要

为了评估色度信息与亮度信息对婴儿运动处理的相对贡献,我们采用了运动检测(M:D)范式。刺激物由27度×40度、0.25周/度的正弦光栅组成,以22度/秒(5.6赫兹)的速度移动,且要么是色度定义的,要么是亮度定义的。使用定向眼动技术获得运动方向(M)的对比度阈值。使用强制选择优先注视法获得检测(D)的对比度阈值。获得了个体婴儿受试者的M:D阈值比,并将结果与成年人的结果进行比较。正如预期的那样,对于亮度定义的刺激物,成年人的M:D阈值比接近1:1,但对于色度定义的刺激物则大于1:1。这表明,对于成年人来说,亮度定义而非色度定义的刺激物是通过标记运动方向的机制检测到的。相比之下,色度和亮度定义的刺激物的婴儿M:D比大致相等且接近1:1,这表明,对于婴儿来说,亮度以及色度定义的刺激物都是通过标记运动方向的机制检测到的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验