Kurbacher C M, Cree I A, Brenne U, Bruckner H W, Kurbacher J A, Mallmann P, Andreotti P E, Krebs D
Universitäts-Frauenklinik, Bonn, Germany.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1996;41(2):161-70. doi: 10.1007/BF01807161.
Apart from clinical trials, mitoxantrone (MX) is rarely used in breast cancer (BC) due to the anticipated anthracycline cross-resistance. We have examined this drug versus doxorubicin (DOX) using data obtained from in vitro microplate ATP tumor chemosensitivity assays (ATP-TCA) of BC cells which were derived from 55 chemotherapy-naive patients at time of primary surgery. Both drugs were tested at 6 different concentrations ranging from 6.25% to 200% peak plasma concentration in vivo (PPC). Differences between DOX and MX observed for mean IC50, IC90, and a sensitivity index (SI) were not statistically significant. In vitro response rates were 44% for DOX and 52% for MX. 34 of 52 eligible assays (65%) showed comparable activity of both drugs whereas a lack of cross-resistance was observed in the remaining 18 (35%) tumors as indicated by differences for SI. Cumulative concentration-response plots of tumors responding in vitro with a > or = 50 percent or > or = 90 percent tumor cell inhibition showed a strong dose-dependence for both DOX and MX at concentrations which normally can be achieved within clinical tumors (i.e. 6.25%-50% PPC). At higher concentrations, however, cytotoxicity of DOX and MX could not be improved by further in vitro dose escalation. Moreover, a substantial proportion of BC specimens (DOX: 48.1%; MX: 40.4%) did not experience a > or = 90 tumor cell inhibition at 200% PPC. In conclusion, in vitro results obtained by ATP-TCA indicate that there is no cross-resistance between MX and DOX in a substantial proportion of BC patients. This may be clinically useful and suggests that combinations including MX should be tested in patients clinically resistant to DOX containing regimens. Since both drugs produced sigmoidal concentration-response curves, dose escalation beyond a certain point may not produce increased sensitivity.
除临床试验外,由于预期的蒽环类药物交叉耐药性,米托蒽醌(MX)很少用于乳腺癌(BC)治疗。我们使用从55例初次手术时未经化疗的患者的BC细胞体外微孔板ATP肿瘤化学敏感性测定(ATP-TCA)中获得的数据,对该药物与阿霉素(DOX)进行了比较。两种药物均在体内峰值血浆浓度(PPC)的6.25%至200%范围内的6种不同浓度下进行测试。观察到的DOX和MX在平均IC50、IC90和敏感性指数(SI)之间的差异无统计学意义。DOX的体外反应率为44%,MX为52%。52项合格测定中的34项(65%)显示两种药物具有相当的活性,而其余18项(35%)肿瘤中观察到缺乏交叉耐药性,如SI差异所示。体外对肿瘤细胞抑制率≥50%或≥90%的肿瘤的累积浓度-反应曲线显示,在临床肿瘤通常可达到的浓度(即6.25%-50%PPC)下,DOX和MX均有很强的剂量依赖性。然而,在更高浓度下,进一步体外增加剂量并不能提高DOX和MX的细胞毒性。此外,相当一部分BC标本(DOX:48.1%;MX:40.4%)在200%PPC时未达到≥90%的肿瘤细胞抑制率。总之,ATP-TCA获得的体外结果表明,在相当一部分BC患者中,MX和DOX之间不存在交叉耐药性。这在临床上可能有用,表明对于对含DOX方案临床耐药的患者,应测试包括MX的联合用药。由于两种药物均产生S形浓度-反应曲线,超过某一点的剂量增加可能不会提高敏感性。