McCann J, Reay D, Siebert J, Stephens B G, Wirtz S
Department of Pediatrics, University of California-Davis Medical Center, Sacramento 95817, USA.
Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 1996 Dec;17(4):289-98. doi: 10.1097/00000433-199612000-00003.
The postmortem finding of anal dilation or an exposed pectinate line in children who have died under suspicious circumstances continues to raise the concern of possible sexual abuse. The following multicenter, collaborative study was designed to help address that question. Sixty-five subjects, ranging in age from birth to 17 years, were autopsied at three different sites. A standard protocol along with 35-mm cameras were used to record the results. Thirty-eight (58%) subjects were boys, and 27 (42%) were girls. Forty-two (65%) were white, 10 (15%) African-American, five (8%) Asian, three (5%) white Hispanic and five (8%) other. Fifty-seven (88%) were in Tanner stage I of secondary sexual development. Thirty-four (52%) died of natural causes, 26 (40%) from accidental injuries, three (5%) from other causes, and four (6%) as a result of a homicide. Forty-eight subjects (74%) had some dilation of the anal sphincters. In 21 children (32%), the entire anal canal, including the rectal ampulla, could be visualized. In another 21 (32%) subjects, the pectinate line was exposed. Only the outer portion of the anal canal opened in six children (10%), whereas 17 (26%) had no dilatation of the anus. Anal laxity led to flattened skin folds in 50 (77%), a shallow anal canal in 40 (62%), the exposure of both the pectinate line in 38 (59%), and the anal mucosa in 24 (37%). Venous congestion was present in 14 (22%), venous pooling in three (5%), erythema in six (9%), and increased pigmentation in eight (12%). Funneling was found in two (3%). Blood was present in three (5%), and an abrasion was discovered in one (2%). No fissures, lacerations, hemorrhoids, or scars were found in any of the children. Anal orifice size varied with the age of the child, the amount of traction applied to the buttocks, and a history of a CNS injury at the time of death. It is suggested, finally, that anal dilatation alone cannot be used a marker for prior sexual abuse and the exposure of the pectinate line should not be confused with tears or fissures of the anal verge. Further studies of children known to have been sodomized prior to death are required.
在死因可疑的儿童尸检中发现肛门扩张或梳状线外露,这一情况持续引发人们对可能存在性虐待的担忧。以下这项多中心协作研究旨在帮助解答这一问题。65名年龄从出生到17岁的受试者在三个不同地点接受了尸检。采用标准方案并使用35毫米相机记录结果。38名(58%)受试者为男孩,27名(42%)为女孩。42名(65%)为白人,10名(15%)为非裔美国人,5名(8%)为亚洲人,3名(5%)为西班牙裔白人,5名(8%)为其他种族。57名(88%)处于青春期第二性征发育的坦纳I期。34名(52%)死于自然原因,26名(40%)死于意外伤害,3名(5%)死于其他原因,4名(6%)死于 homicide (此处原文有误,根据语境推测可能是“他杀”,但需确认原文准确信息)。48名受试者(74%)存在肛门括约肌扩张。在21名儿童(32%)中,整个肛管,包括直肠壶腹,都清晰可见。在另外21名(32%)受试者中,梳状线外露。仅肛管外部开口的有6名儿童(10%),而17名(26%)肛门无扩张。肛门松弛导致50名(77%)皮肤褶皱变平,40名(62%)肛管变浅,38名(59%)梳状线外露,24名(37%)肛门黏膜外露。14名(22%)存在静脉淤血,3名(5%)有静脉池,6名(9%)有红斑,8名(12%)色素沉着增加。发现2名(3%)有漏斗状改变。3名(5%)有血液,1名(2%)发现有擦伤。所有儿童均未发现肛裂、撕裂伤、痔疮或瘢痕。肛门开口大小随儿童年龄、对臀部施加的牵引力度以及死亡时中枢神经系统损伤史而变化。最后建议,仅肛门扩张不能用作先前性虐待的标志,梳状线外露不应与肛门边缘的撕裂或肛裂相混淆。需要对已知在死亡前遭受鸡奸的儿童进行进一步研究。