van Ginneken A M
Department of medical Informatics, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp. 1996:797-801.
The capture of patient data in a structured format receives increasing attention. Data can be extracted from free text using natural language processing techniques, but it can also be collected in a structured fashion at the time of data entry. The latter has the advantage that completeness and unambiguity can be promoted by offering predefined terms and options for description of findings. The paper discusses two models for supporting structured data entry. In the direct model, there is an immediate relationship between the terms and options for data entry and the structure of the underlying database. In the indirect model, terms and options for data entry are based on a controlled vocabulary and not directly related to the structure in which actual data is represented. Both models have been utilized by ORCA (Open Record for CAre). We discuss the pros and cons of these two models in relation to the type of patient data and the task involved. It is concluded that a strategic combination of both models has more strengths and less weaknesses than the use of each model only.
以结构化格式获取患者数据越来越受到关注。数据可以使用自然语言处理技术从自由文本中提取,但也可以在数据录入时以结构化方式收集。后者的优点是通过提供预定义的术语和用于描述发现的选项,可以提高完整性和明确性。本文讨论了两种支持结构化数据录入的模型。在直接模型中,数据录入的术语和选项与基础数据库的结构之间存在直接关系。在间接模型中,数据录入的术语和选项基于受控词汇表,与实际数据所呈现的结构没有直接关系。这两种模型都已被ORCA(医疗开放记录)所采用。我们结合患者数据类型和所涉及的任务讨论了这两种模型的优缺点。结论是,与仅使用每种模型相比,两种模型的战略组合具有更多优点和更少缺点。