Suppr超能文献

护理人员干预的潜在影响。

Hidden impact of paramedic interventions.

作者信息

Powar M, Nguyen-Van-Tam J, Pearson J, Dove A

机构信息

Department of Public Health Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Nottingham, Medical School, Queens Medical Centre, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Accid Emerg Med. 1996 Nov;13(6):383-5. doi: 10.1136/emj.13.6.383.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine current patterns of deployment and use of emergency ambulance crews in Nottinghamshire, with particular reference to crew status (technician or paramedic), case mix, interventions performed, and operational times.

METHODS

A retrospective survey of routinely collected computerised ambulance service despatch data, and patient treatment forms for 242 randomly selected emergency callouts in Nottinghamshire, during September 1994. Data were collected on patient demography, broad diagnostic group, crew status and operational times, and paramedic interventions performed.

RESULTS

170 of 242 callouts (70%) involved a paramedic crew; extended skills were used on 31 of these occasions (18%), predominantly for medical emergencies. Paramedic crews recorded significantly longer on-scene times (median time: 14.0 v 11.5 min, P = 0.04). An examination of the difference between paramedics who performed interventions and those who did not revealed that "intervening" paramedics recorded significantly longer onscene times (median time: 23 v 12 min, P < 0.001), turnaround times (median time: 28 v 18 min, P < 0.001), and total out-of-service times (median time 73 v 51 min, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The additional time taken by paramedics at the scene of an emergency incident relates to their performance of an intervention, rather than time spent assessing the patient to decide whether stabilisation or immediate evacuation would be most appropriate. Paramedic interventions were most often performed for medical emergencies. The performance of paramedic interventions also extended turnaround times and total out-of-service times.

摘要

目的

研究诺丁汉郡紧急救护人员的当前部署和使用模式,特别关注救护人员状态(技术员或护理人员)、病例组合、实施的干预措施及作业时间。

方法

对1994年9月诺丁汉郡随机抽取的242次紧急出诊的常规收集的计算机化救护车服务调度数据及患者治疗表格进行回顾性调查。收集了患者人口统计学信息、大致诊断组、救护人员状态和作业时间,以及护理人员实施的干预措施等数据。

结果

242次出诊中有170次(70%)涉及护理人员团队;其中31次(18%)使用了扩展技能,主要用于医疗紧急情况。护理人员团队记录的现场时间明显更长(中位时间:14.0对11.5分钟,P = 0.04)。对实施干预措施的护理人员和未实施干预措施的护理人员之间的差异进行检查发现,“进行干预”的护理人员记录的现场时间明显更长(中位时间:23对12分钟,P < 0.001)、周转时间更长(中位时间:28对18分钟,P < 0.001)以及总非服务时间更长(中位时间73对51分钟,P < 0.001)。

结论

护理人员在紧急事件现场花费的额外时间与其实施的干预措施有关,而非用于评估患者以决定最适合的稳定措施或立即撤离措施的时间。护理人员的干预措施最常用于医疗紧急情况。护理人员干预措施的实施也延长了周转时间和总非服务时间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5719/1342802/483e207a4b62/jaccidem00015-0016-a.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验