Champion H R, Sacco W J, Copes W S, Gann D S, Gennarelli T A, Flanagan M E
Surgical Critical Care Services, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC 20010.
J Trauma. 1989 May;29(5):623-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198905000-00017.
The Trauma Score (TS) has been revised. The revision includes Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and respiratory rate (RR) and excludes capillary refill and respiratory expansion, which were difficult to assess in the field. Two versions of the revised score have been developed, one for triage (T-RTS) and another for use in outcome evaluations and to control for injury severity (RTS). T-RTS, the sum of coded values of GCS, SBP, and RR, demonstrated increased sensitivity and some loss in specificity when compared with a triage criterion based on TS and GCS values. T-RTS correctly identified more than 97% of nonsurvivors as requiring trauma center care. The T-RTS triage criterion does not require summing of the coded values and is more easily implemented than the TS criterion. RTS is a weighted sum of coded variable values. The RTS demonstrated substantially improved reliability in outcome predictions compared to the TS. The RTS also yielded more accurate outcome predictions for patients with serious head injuries than the TS.
创伤评分(TS)已被修订。修订内容包括格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)、收缩压(SBP)和呼吸频率(RR),并排除了在现场难以评估的毛细血管再充盈和呼吸扩张情况。已制定了修订评分的两个版本,一个用于分诊(T-RTS),另一个用于结果评估和控制损伤严重程度(RTS)。与基于TS和GCS值的分诊标准相比,T-RTS(GCS、SBP和RR编码值之和)显示出更高的敏感性,但特异性有所降低。T-RTS正确识别出超过97%的非幸存者需要创伤中心治疗。T-RTS分诊标准不需要对编码值进行求和,并且比TS标准更易于实施。RTS是编码变量值的加权和。与TS相比,RTS在结果预测方面显示出显著提高的可靠性。对于重度颅脑损伤患者,RTS也比TS产生更准确的结果预测。