Carr K D
Department of Psychiatry New York University Medical Center, New York 10016, USA.
Neurochem Res. 1996 Nov;21(11):1455-67. doi: 10.1007/BF02532386.
The incentive-motivating effects of external stimuli are dependent, in part, upon the internal need state of the organism. The increased rewarding efficacy of food as a function of energy deficit, for example, has obvious adaptive value. The enhancement of food reward extends, however, to drugs of abuse and electrical brain stimulation, probably due to a shared neural substrate. Research reviewed in this paper uses lateral hypothalamic electrical stimulation to probe the sensitivity of the brain reward system and investigate mechanisms through which metabolic need, induced by chronic food restriction and streptozotocin-induced diabetes, sensitizes this system. Results indicate that sensitivity to rewarding brain stimulation varies inversely with declining body weight. The effect is not mimicked by pharmacological glucoprivation or lipoprivation in ad libitum fed animals; sensitization appears to depend on persistent metabolic need or adipose depletion. While the literature suggests elevated plasma corticosterone as a peripheral trigger of reward sensitization, sensitization was not reversed by meal-induced or pharmacological suppression of plasma corticosterone. Centrally, reward sensitization is mediated by opioid receptors, since the effect is reversed by intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) infusion of naltrexone, TCTAP (mu antagonist) and nor-binaltorphimine (kappa antagonist). The fact that these same treatments, as well as i.c.v. infusion of dynorphin A antiserum, block the feeding response to lateral hypothalamic stimulation suggests that feeding and reward sensitization are mediated by a common opioid mechanism. Using in vitro autoradiography, radioimmunoassays and a solution hybridization mRNA assay, brain regional mu and kappa opioid receptor binding, levels of prodynorphin-derived peptides, and prodynorphin mRNA, respectively, were measured in food-restricted and diabetic rats. Changes that could plausibly be involved in reward sensitization are discussed, with emphasis on the increased dynorphin A1-3 and prodynorphin mRNA levels in lateral hypothalamic neurons that innervate the pontine parabrachial nucleus, where mu binding decreased and kappa binding increased. Finally, the possible linkage between metabolic need and activation of a brain opioid mechanism is discussed, as is evidence supporting the relevance of these findings to drug abuse.
外部刺激的激励作用部分取决于机体的内部需求状态。例如,食物作为能量缺乏函数的奖励功效增加具有明显的适应性价值。然而,食物奖励的增强也延伸到滥用药物和脑电刺激,这可能是由于共享的神经基质。本文综述的研究使用下丘脑外侧电刺激来探测脑奖励系统的敏感性,并研究慢性食物限制和链脲佐菌素诱导的糖尿病所引起的代谢需求使该系统敏感化的机制。结果表明,对奖励性脑刺激的敏感性与体重下降呈负相关。在自由进食的动物中,药理学上的糖剥夺或脂肪剥夺并不能模拟这种效应;敏感化似乎取决于持续的代谢需求或脂肪消耗。虽然文献表明血浆皮质酮升高是奖励敏感化的外周触发因素,但进食诱导或药理学抑制血浆皮质酮并不能逆转敏感化。在中枢,奖励敏感化由阿片受体介导,因为脑室内注射纳曲酮、TCTAP(μ拮抗剂)和去甲双丙吗啡(κ拮抗剂)可逆转这种效应。这些相同的处理以及脑室内注射强啡肽A抗血清可阻断对下丘脑外侧刺激的进食反应,这一事实表明进食和奖励敏感化由共同的阿片机制介导。使用体外放射自显影、放射免疫测定和溶液杂交mRNA测定,分别测量了食物限制和糖尿病大鼠脑区μ和κ阿片受体结合、强啡肽原衍生肽水平和强啡肽原mRNA。讨论了可能与奖励敏感化有关的变化,重点是支配脑桥臂旁核的下丘脑外侧神经元中强啡肽A1-3和强啡肽原mRNA水平的增加,其中μ结合减少而κ结合增加。最后,讨论了代谢需求与脑阿片机制激活之间的可能联系,以及支持这些发现与药物滥用相关性的证据。