Gerstmann D R, Minton S D, Stoddard R A, Meredith K S, Monaco F, Bertrand J M, Battisti O, Langhendries J P, Francois A, Clark R H
Utah Valley Regional Medical Center, Provo 84604, USA.
Pediatrics. 1996 Dec;98(6 Pt 1):1044-57.
To compare the hospital course and clinical outcome of preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome treated with surfactant and managed with high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) or conventional mechanical ventilation (CV) as their primary mode of ventilator support.
A prospective randomized clinical trial.
Three community-based level III neonatal intensive care units.
A total of 125 neonates who were 35 weeks or less estimated gestation requiring intubation and assisted ventilation for respiratory distress syndrome with arterial to alveolar oxygen ratio less than .50.
Patients were randomized to continue CV (61 patients) or be changed to HFOV (64 patients) after exogenous surfactant administration (100 mg/kg). HFOV was used in a strategy to promote lung recruitment and maintain lung volume. Protocol respiratory care guidelines were followed; otherwise routine care was provided by each neonatal intensive care unit.
No differences were noted in demographic features between the two study groups. The study population birth weight was 1.51 +/- .47 kg (mean +/- SD), gestational age was 30.9 +/- 2.5 weeks, and study entry age was 2 to 3 hours. Patients randomized to HFOV demonstrated the following significant findings compared with CV-treated patients: vasopressor support was less intensive; surfactant redosing was not as frequent; oxygenation improved more rapidly and remained higher during the first 7 days; fewer infants required prolonged supplemental oxygen or ventilator support; treatment failure was reduced; more patients survived without chronic lung disease at 30 days; need for continuous supplemental oxygen at discharge was less; frequency of necrotizing enterocolitis illness was lower; there were fewer abnormal hearing tests; and hospital costs were decreased. No differences were seen between the two study groups in the frequency or severity of patent ductus arteriosus, air leak, retinopathy of prematurity, or intraventricular hemorrhage. Length of hospital stay and survival to discharge were similar for HFOV- and CV-treated infants.
When used early with a lung recruitment strategy, HFOV after surfactant replacement resulted in clinical outcomes consistent with a reduction in both acute and chronic lung injury. Benefit was evident for preterm infants both less than or equal to 1 kg and more than 1 kg. In addition, early HFOV treatment may have had a more global effect on patient health throughout the hospitalization, resulting in reduced morbidity and decreased health care cost.
比较接受表面活性剂治疗并以高频振荡通气(HFOV)或传统机械通气(CV)作为主要通气支持模式的呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿的住院病程和临床结局。
一项前瞻性随机临床试验。
三个社区三级新生儿重症监护病房。
总共125例估计孕周35周及以下、因呼吸窘迫综合征需要插管和辅助通气且动脉血氧与肺泡氧比值小于0.50的新生儿。
在外源性表面活性剂给药(100mg/kg)后,将患者随机分为继续CV组(61例患者)或改为HFOV组(64例患者)。HFOV用于促进肺复张和维持肺容积的策略。遵循方案中的呼吸护理指南;否则由各新生儿重症监护病房提供常规护理。
两组研究对象的人口统计学特征无差异。研究人群的出生体重为1.51±0.47kg(均值±标准差),孕周为30.9±2.5周,入组年龄为2至3小时。与接受CV治疗的患者相比,随机分配至HFOV组的患者有以下显著结果:血管活性药物支持强度较低;表面活性剂再次给药频率较低;氧合改善更快且在头7天内维持在较高水平;需要长期补充氧气或通气支持的婴儿较少;治疗失败率降低;30天时更多患者存活且无慢性肺病;出院时持续补充氧气的需求较少;坏死性小肠结肠炎发病率较低;听力测试异常较少;住院费用降低。两组研究对象在动脉导管未闭、气漏、早产儿视网膜病变或脑室内出血的发生率或严重程度方面无差异。HFOV组和CV组治疗的婴儿住院时间和出院存活率相似。
在早期采用肺复张策略时,表面活性剂替代后使用HFOV可使临床结局与急性和慢性肺损伤的减少相一致。对于体重小于或等于1kg以及大于1kg的早产儿,益处均很明显。此外早期HFOV治疗可能对患者整个住院期间的健康产生更全面的影响,从而降低发病率并减少医疗费用。