Crawford J R, Mychalkiw B, Johnson D A, Moore J W
Department of Psychology, King's College, University of Aberdeen, UK.
Br J Clin Psychol. 1996 Nov;35(4):638-40. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1996.tb01221.x.
Regression equations developed by Crawford, Allan & Jack (1992) to estimate full-length WAIS-R IQs from seven short-forms were evaluated in healthy (N = 153) and neurological (N = 471) cross-validation samples. In the healthy sample the correlations between the short-forms and full-length IQs did not differ significantly from those obtained by Crawford et al. (1992). In the neurological sample the six- and seven-subtest short-forms, proposed by Crawford et al. (1992) and Warrington, James & Maciejewski (1986) respectively, differed from the other short-forms in that they had significantly higher criterion validity coefficients and did not systematically under- or overestimate IQs.
克劳福德、艾伦和杰克(1992年)开发了回归方程,用于从七种简版量表估计韦氏成人智力量表修订版(WAIS-R)的全长智商,该方程在健康(N = 153)和神经学(N = 471)交叉验证样本中进行了评估。在健康样本中,简版量表与全长智商之间的相关性与克劳福德等人(1992年)获得的相关性没有显著差异。在神经学样本中,克劳福德等人(1992年)和沃林顿、詹姆斯与马切耶夫斯基(1986年)分别提出的六分测验和七分测验简版量表与其他简版量表不同,它们具有显著更高的效标效度系数,并且不会系统性地低估或高估智商。