Guilmette T J, Dabrowski J, Kennedy M L, Gnys J
Providence College, Southern New England Rehabilitation Center, Providence, 02918, USA.
Assessment. 1999 Mar;6(1):33-42. doi: 10.1177/107319119900600104.
Scores from nine WAIS-R short forms were calculated for a sample of 75 adults with mild to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Although all nine of the short forms were significantly correlated with the WAIS-R Full Scale IQ, three of the short forms (Vocabulary-Block Design; Vocabulary-Block Design-Arithmetic-Similarities; Vocabulary-Arithmetic-Picture Arrangement-Block Design) significantly overestimated the WAIS-R IQ and thus may be inappropriate to use with this population. The remaining six short forms did not differ significantly from the WAIS-R Full Scale IQ. Among these six, Ward s seven-subtest short form appeared to exhibit the least variability in predicting the WAIS-R Full Scale IQ. Information is presented and discussed regarding the absolute difference scores between short form IQ estimates and the WAIS-R as well as the proportion of short forms which significantly under- and overestimate the Full Scale IQ.
对75名患有轻至重度创伤性脑损伤（TBI）的成年人样本计算了九种韦氏成人智力量表修订版（WAIS-R）简式量表的得分。尽管所有九种简式量表都与WAIS-R全量表智商显著相关，但其中三种简式量表（词汇-积木图案；词汇-积木图案-算术-相似性；词汇-算术-图片排列-积木图案）显著高估了WAIS-R智商，因此可能不适用于该人群。其余六种简式量表与WAIS-R全量表智商没有显著差异。在这六种量表中，沃德的七项分测验简式量表在预测WAIS-R全量表智商时似乎表现出最小的变异性。文中给出并讨论了简式量表智商估计值与WAIS-R之间的绝对差异分数，以及显著低估和高估全量表智商的简式量表比例。
