Ifudu O, Dawood M, Homel P, Friedman E A
Department of Medicine, State University of New York Health Science Center, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA.
Am J Kidney Dis. 1996 Dec;28(6):841-5. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(96)90383-2.
Many inner-city residents with progressive renal disease do not receive specialist care from a nephrologist, and often arrive in the emergency room manifesting life-threatening uremic symptoms requiring emergency rescue dialysis. We examined the relationship between the quality of medical care received during progression to end-stage renal disease, and the clinical condition and morbidity at initiation of renal replacement therapy. During a 5-year period (January 1990 to December 1994), we prospectively studied 139 consecutive inner-city residents with a confirmed diagnosis of chronic renal failure who were starting uremia therapy. At onset of study, subjects were sorted into one of three groups depending on the extent of medical care received during the 3 years immediately preceding initiation of hemodialysis: nephrologist, nonnephrologist (physician), or no medical care. Information obtained from each subject included length of hospital stay during the admission for initiation of dialysis therapy and the type of hemodialysis vascular access used for first dialysis treatment (permanent v temporary). Predialysis blood urea nitrogen concentration, serum creatinine concentration, serum albumin concentration, and serum bicarbonate concentration were measured once immediately before the first dialysis. The 139 study subjects (62 men and 77 women) comprised 116 blacks (83%), 15 Hispanics (11%), and eight whites (6%), and had a mean age of 56 +/- 15 years (+/-SD). Only 59 (43%) subjects received prior specialist nephrologist care, and their mean length of hospital stay (12 +/- 23 days) was shorter than that of subjects who received nonnephrologist care (n = 63 [45%]; 25 +/- 21 days) or those who received no prior medical care (n = 17 [12%]; 29 +/- 23 days) (P = 0.002). Temporary hemodialysis vascular access was used for the first dialysis in all 17 (100%) of the subjects with no prior medical care, in 56 (89%) of the 63 subjects who received prior care from a nonnephrologist, and in 21 (36%) of the 59 subjects who received prior care from a nephrologist (P = 0.0001). Subjects who received prior care from a nephrologist had a lower mean serum creatinine concentration at initiation of dialysis (11 +/- 4.4 mg/dL) than did either the subjects who received nonnephrologist care (13 +/- 5.4 mg/dL) or no medical care (16 +/- 5.7 mg/dL) (P = 0.003). In addition, subjects who received prior care from a nephrologist had less severe metabolic acidosis than the subjects in the other two groups (P = 0.04). We infer that initiation of uremia therapy is delayed in inner-city residents with progressive renal failure who do not receive specialist nephrologic care, and that as a consequence these patients suffer excess short-term morbidity.
许多患有进行性肾病的市中心居民没有得到肾病专家的专科护理,常常在出现危及生命的尿毒症症状时才到急诊室,需要紧急抢救透析。我们研究了在进展至终末期肾病过程中所接受医疗护理的质量与开始肾脏替代治疗时的临床状况及发病率之间的关系。在5年期间(1990年1月至1994年12月),我们前瞻性地研究了139名连续的市中心居民,他们被确诊为慢性肾衰竭并开始接受尿毒症治疗。在研究开始时,根据开始血液透析前3年所接受医疗护理的程度,将受试者分为三组之一:肾病专家护理组、非肾病专家(内科医生)护理组或无医疗护理组。从每个受试者获得的信息包括开始透析治疗住院期间的住院时间以及首次透析治疗所使用的血液透析血管通路类型(永久性或临时性)。在首次透析前立即测量透析前血尿素氮浓度、血清肌酐浓度、血清白蛋白浓度和血清碳酸氢盐浓度。139名研究受试者(62名男性和77名女性)包括116名黑人(83%)、15名西班牙裔(11%)和8名白人(6%),平均年龄为56±15岁(±标准差)。只有59名(43%)受试者接受过肾病专家的专科护理,他们的平均住院时间(12±23天)比接受非肾病专家护理的受试者(n = 63 [45%];25±21天)或未接受过先前医疗护理的受试者(n = 17 [12%];29±23天)短(P = 0.002)。在17名(100%)未接受过先前医疗护理的受试者、63名接受过非肾病专家先前护理的受试者中的56名(89%)以及59名接受过肾病专家先前护理的受试者中的21名(36%)中,首次透析使用了临时性血液透析血管通路(P = 0.0001)。接受过肾病专家先前护理的受试者在开始透析时的平均血清肌酐浓度(11±4.4mg/dL)低于接受非肾病专家护理的受试者(13±5.4mg/dL)或未接受医疗护理的受试者(16±5.7mg/dL)(P = 0.003)。此外,接受过肾病专家先前护理的受试者的代谢性酸中毒比其他两组受试者轻(P = 0.04)。我们推断,未接受肾病专家专科护理且患有进行性肾衰竭的市中心居民开始尿毒症治疗的时间延迟,因此这些患者遭受了额外的短期发病情况。