• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

宫颈细胞学报告率的比较:外部质量保证的有用辅助手段

Comparison of cervical cytology reporting rates: a useful adjunct to external quality assurance.

作者信息

Butland D, Herbert A

机构信息

Histopathology Department, Southampton General Hospital, UK.

出版信息

Cytopathology. 1996 Dec;7(6):391-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.1996.tb00544.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2303.1996.tb00544.x
PMID:8958472
Abstract

Reporting rates for abnormal and inadequate cervical smears have been compared during a 5-year period in nine laboratories and related to targets and achievable ranges recently recommended by the National Health Service Cervical Screening Programme (NHSCSP). There was improved consistency in rates for all grades of abnormality as well as inadequate smears. The average rate for moderate and severe dyskaryosis combined increased to 1.6%, which is the target recommended by the NHSCSP, and the standard deviation fell from 0.52 to 0.27. Although average rates for mild dyskaryosis and borderline nuclear change combined and inadequate smears both remained within the achievable range recommended by the NHSCSP, four laboratories were above the upper limit for each of those categories in the final year. During the 5 years of the study there was a fall in the number of 'inflammatory' smears coded as negative with a recommendation for early repeat. Only one laboratory still uses that category. The challenge for the future lies in controlling high rates for minor abnormalities and inadequate smears while maintaining acceptable rates for moderate and severe dyskaryosis. Comparison of reporting rates is regarded by the participating laboratories as a useful adjunct to external quality assurance.

摘要

在九年时间里,对九个实验室五年间异常及不合格宫颈涂片的报告率进行了比较,并与英国国家医疗服务体系宫颈筛查计划(NHSCSP)最近推荐的目标及可实现范围相关联。所有等级异常以及不合格涂片的报告率一致性均有所提高。中度和重度核异质合并的平均报告率升至1.6%,这是NHSCSP推荐的目标,标准差从0.52降至0.27。尽管轻度核异质和核周界改变合并以及不合格涂片的平均报告率仍处于NHSCSP推荐的可实现范围内,但在最后一年,有四个实验室超出了这些类别各自的上限。在研究的五年中,编码为阴性且建议早期复查的“炎症性”涂片数量有所下降。只有一个实验室仍在使用该类别。未来的挑战在于控制轻微异常和不合格涂片的高报告率,同时保持中度和重度核异质的可接受报告率。参与研究的实验室认为,报告率的比较是外部质量保证的有益辅助手段。

相似文献

1
Comparison of cervical cytology reporting rates: a useful adjunct to external quality assurance.宫颈细胞学报告率的比较:外部质量保证的有用辅助手段
Cytopathology. 1996 Dec;7(6):391-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.1996.tb00544.x.
2
Personal performance profiles: a useful adjunct to quality assurance in cervical cytology.个人绩效档案:宫颈细胞学质量保证的有用辅助手段。
Cytopathology. 1998 Jun;9(3):162-70. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2303.1998.00127.x.
3
Achievable standards, benchmarks for reporting, and criteria for evaluating cervical cytopathology. Second edition including revised performance indicators.可实现的标准、报告基准以及宫颈细胞病理学评估标准。第二版,包括修订后的绩效指标。
Cytopathology. 2000 Aug;11(4):212-41. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2303.2000.00269.x.
4
Liquid-based cytology and conventional smears compared over two 12-month periods.
Cytopathology. 2006 Apr;17(2):82-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2006.00339.x.
5
A study of the effect of introducing a restrictive cervical screening policy on laboratory workload and cervical cancer detection rates.一项关于引入限制性宫颈癌筛查政策对实验室工作量和宫颈癌检出率影响的研究。
Cytopathology. 1990;1(1):13-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.1990.tb00321.x.
6
Analysis of inadequate cervical smears using Shewhart control charts.使用休哈特控制图分析宫颈涂片不合格情况。
BMC Public Health. 2004 Jun 29;4:25. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-4-25.
7
Assessment of automated primary screening on PAPNET of cervical smears in the PRISMATIC trial. PRISMATIC Project Management Team.
Lancet. 1999 Apr 24;353(9162):1381-5.
8
Rapid pre-screening: a validated quality assurance measure in cervical cytology.快速预筛查:宫颈细胞学中一项经过验证的质量保证措施。
Cytopathology. 2003 Oct;14(5):275-80. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2303.2003.00062.x.
9
Performance of the DNA-Citoliq liquid-based cytology system compared with conventional smears.将DNA-Citoliq液基细胞学系统与传统涂片进行比较的性能。
Cytopathology. 2006 Apr;17(2):86-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2006.00279.x.
10
Anglian Genitourinary Medicine Audit Group -- cervical cytology screening in HIV-positive women.东安格利亚泌尿生殖医学审计小组——HIV 阳性女性的宫颈细胞学筛查
Int J STD AIDS. 2009 Jan;20(1):58-60. doi: 10.1258/ijsa.2008.008224.

引用本文的文献

1
Is the proficiency test in cervical cytology proficient?宫颈细胞学 proficiency 测试是否达标? (注:这里 proficiency 结合语境可能是“能力验证”之类更准确的医学术语含义,仅按要求直接翻译)
J Clin Pathol. 1997 Jun;50(6):450-3. doi: 10.1136/jcp.50.6.450.