Cairns J, Bidwell J R
Department of Biology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.
Environ Health Perspect. 1996 Nov;104(11):1142-5. doi: 10.1289/ehp.961041142.
Drastic reductions in Earth's biodiversity, old growth forests, top soil, clean water and air, and truly wild areas are occurring during a period when discussions of sustainable growth and sustainable production are becoming common. Using such terms as sustainable growth and sustainable production rather than the more accurate sustainable use of the planet leaves the impression that, with a little more skill, society can continue its present practices indefinitely. A number of explanations are possible for this desire to maintain two conflicting beliefs (i.e., severe environmental destruction occurs but society can continue its basic practices indefinitely): 1) the idea that a technological solution can be found for every problem; 2) an addiction to present behavioral norms, which is so strong that the consequences of continuing such behavior are irrelevant; and 3) the concept that, while human society can alter natural systems to suit its own needs, natural systems are incapable of altering human society. This last issue is the focus of this discussion: if human society eliminates all species on the planet that are incapable of tolerating human society's present practices, the only species remaining will be those that human society is unable to control successfully or eliminate; these species are called pests. Another hypothesis could be stated: a world of pests that human society cannot control effectively will inevitably reshape human society through disease and famine, technological breakdown, and interference with domesticated and wild species upon which the integrity of human societal structure depends.
在关于可持续增长和可持续生产的讨论日益普遍的时期,地球的生物多样性、原始森林、表层土壤、清洁水和空气以及真正的荒野正在急剧减少。使用可持续增长和可持续生产这样的术语,而不是更准确的对地球的可持续利用,给人的印象是,只要稍微多一些技巧,社会就可以无限期地延续其当前的做法。对于维持这两种相互冲突的信念(即环境遭到严重破坏,但社会可以无限期地延续其基本做法)的这种愿望,有多种解释:1)认为每个问题都能找到技术解决方案的想法;2)对当前行为规范的沉迷,这种沉迷如此强烈,以至于继续这种行为的后果无关紧要;3)认为虽然人类社会可以改变自然系统以满足自身需求,但自然系统却无法改变人类社会的观念。最后这个问题是本次讨论的焦点:如果人类社会消灭地球上所有无法容忍人类社会当前做法的物种,那么剩下的唯一物种将是那些人类社会无法成功控制或消灭的物种;这些物种被称为害虫。另一种假设可以表述为:一个人类社会无法有效控制害虫的世界将不可避免地通过疾病和饥荒、技术崩溃以及对人类社会结构完整性所依赖的驯化物种和野生物种的干扰来重塑人类社会。