Brown B, Nolan P, Crawford P, Lewis A
School of Social Sciences, De Montfort University, Milton Keynes, U.K.
Soc Sci Med. 1996 Dec;43(11):1569-78. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00053-6.
The traditional emphasis in psychiatry about "listening to patients" has recently been added to by the development of what we call the "narrative turn" in mental health care where clients' narratives are emphasised. We shall argue however that both approaches tend to embody similar assumptions about therapeutic transactions and roles, and that much work emphasising narratives reveals little about how therapists and researchers work to reconstruct the clients' accounts. It is therefore vital that the emphasis on narratives be supplemented by a more thoroughgoing approach to shared structures of knowledge which act to prefigure clients' distress, how professional records are a profoundly transformative medium, and how therapeutic encounters work to co-construct clients' narratives, rather than simply reflect or explore them. The radical implications of thinking about therapy in terms of narrative and language need to be more fully discussed in the therapy literature, so the narrative turn does not simply reproduce the common-sense assumptions of more conventional approaches.
精神病学中传统的对“倾听患者”的强调,最近因我们所称的心理健康护理中的“叙事转向”的发展而得到补充,在这种转向中,患者的叙事受到重视。然而,我们将论证,这两种方法往往体现了关于治疗互动和角色的类似假设,而且许多强调叙事的研究几乎没有揭示治疗师和研究者如何努力重构患者的叙述。因此,至关重要的是,对叙事的强调应以一种更彻底的方法加以补充,这种方法涉及塑造患者痛苦的知识共享结构、专业记录如何成为一种具有深刻变革性的媒介,以及治疗互动如何共同构建患者的叙事,而不仅仅是反映或探索这些叙事。关于治疗从叙事和语言角度进行思考的激进含义,需要在治疗文献中得到更充分的讨论,这样叙事转向就不会简单地重现更传统方法的常识性假设。