Angermeyer M C, Matschinger H
University of Leipzig, Department of Psychiatry, Germany.
Soc Sci Med. 1996 Dec;43(12):1721-8. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00065-2.
This paper tests Scheffs proposition that selective media reporting has a reinforcing effect on the stereotype of mental illness. Based on several population surveys carried out in the "old" Federal Republic of Germany it can be shown that in 1990 there was a marked increase in desired social distance from mentally ill people immediately following violent attacks, by two individuals suffering from schizophrenia, against prominent German politicians. Both events were widely covered in the media. During the following two years expressed social distance decreased slowly. At the close of 1992, however, it was still elevated when compared with the situation in early 1990 before the first assassination attempt had occurred. There was a corresponding trend in the tendency of the public to ascribe the attributes "dangerous" and "unpredictable" to psychiatric patients. Thus, our findings do support Scheffs contention that selective reporting does indeed have an impact on the attitudes of the public as it confirms the stereotype of insanity, which has important implications for public policy issues.
本文检验了谢夫的命题,即媒体的选择性报道会强化对精神疾病的刻板印象。基于在德意志联邦共和国“旧联邦州”进行的多项人口调查,可以看出,1990年,两名患有精神分裂症的人对德国著名政治家发动暴力袭击之后,公众与精神疾病患者之间期望的社会距离显著增加。这两起事件均被媒体广泛报道。在接下来的两年里,表达出的社会距离缓慢下降。然而,到1992年底,与1990年初第一次暗杀企图发生之前的情况相比,这一距离仍然较高。公众将“危险”和“不可预测”等属性归因于精神疾病患者的趋势也呈现出相应的变化。因此,我们的研究结果确实支持了谢夫的观点,即选择性报道确实会对公众态度产生影响,因为它证实了精神错乱的刻板印象,这对公共政策问题具有重要意义。