• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[使用卡迪夫视力测试进行的检查]

[Examinations with the Cardiff Acuity Test].

作者信息

Gräf M, Becker R, Neff A, Kaufmann H

机构信息

Universitäts-Augenklinik für Schielbehandlung und Neuroophthalmologie, Giessen.

出版信息

Ophthalmologe. 1996 Aug;93(4):333-40.

PMID:8963127
Abstract

Recently, a new preferential looking (PL) test has been presented for measuring visual acuity in infants and young children (Cardiff Acuity Test, CAT). The PL target is a schematic vanishing picture composed of isoluminant lines with different spatial orientations. Fifty-three healthy children (4-34 months, group 1), 28 (4-35 months) children at risk for amblyopia due to strabismus (group 2), 19 healthy subjects, and 157 patients (group 3) were tested with the CAT. In group 2 the CAT was compared with the fixation preference test. In group 3 the CAT was compared with a recognition test (Landolt C test). In group 1 the interocular difference of the CAT data was a maximum of 1 dB (70% 0 dB, 30% 1 dB, 1/3 so-called octave). Thus, an interocular difference of > 1 dB was considered to be suggestive of monocular or asymmetrical visual impairment. The maximum value 6/6 was frequently achieved (RE 44%, LE 36%, > 18 months RE 57%, LE 46%). In group 2 only 20% of the monolateral strabismic children showed an interocular difference > 1 dB in the CAT. In group 3 we found significant correlations between the CAT and Landolt acuity. A ratio of about 1.7/1 between CAT and Landolt acuity remained constant in cataract eyes as compared to healthy eyes. In amblyopic eyes due to strabismus this ratio was 3.7/1. Thus, amblyopia was underestimated with the CAT. Without limiting the examination distance, interocular differences > 1 dB in the CAT occurred in 52% of the strabismic amblyopic patients (potential sensitivity). At a distance of 1 m this rate decreased to 22% (real sensitivity). In conclusion, the CAT definitely lacks sensitivity for strabismic amblyopia. The data suggest that the real sensitivity could be improved by using higher spatial frequencies. The use of familiar shapes instead of gratings such as PL targets affects cooperation favorably in 12- to 36-month-old children.

摘要

最近,一种用于测量婴幼儿视力的新型优先注视(PL)测试(加的夫视力测试,CAT)已被提出。PL目标是一幅由具有不同空间方向的等亮度线条组成的示意性消失图片。对53名健康儿童(4 - 34个月,第1组)、28名因斜视有弱视风险的儿童(4 - 35个月,第2组)、19名健康受试者以及157名患者(第3组)进行了CAT测试。在第2组中,将CAT与注视偏好测试进行了比较。在第3组中,将CAT与识别测试(Landolt C测试)进行了比较。在第1组中,CAT数据的眼间差异最大为1 dB(70%为0 dB,30%为1 dB,即1/3所谓的倍频程)。因此,眼间差异>1 dB被认为提示单眼或不对称视力损害。经常能达到最大值6/6(右眼44%,左眼36%,>18个月时右眼57%,左眼46%)。在第2组中,仅20%的单侧斜视儿童在CAT中显示眼间差异>1 dB。在第3组中,我们发现CAT与Landolt视力之间存在显著相关性。与健康眼睛相比,白内障眼中CAT与Landolt视力的比值约为1.7/1,保持恒定。在因斜视导致的弱视眼中,该比值为3.7/1。因此,CAT低估了弱视情况。在不限制检查距离的情况下,52%的斜视性弱视患者在CAT中出现眼间差异>1 dB(潜在敏感性)。在1米的距离时,该比率降至22%(实际敏感性)。总之,CAT对斜视性弱视肯定缺乏敏感性。数据表明,通过使用更高的空间频率可以提高实际敏感性。使用熟悉的形状而非像PL目标那样的光栅,对12至36个月大的儿童的配合有积极影响。

相似文献

1
[Examinations with the Cardiff Acuity Test].[使用卡迪夫视力测试进行的检查]
Ophthalmologe. 1996 Aug;93(4):333-40.
2
Estimation of strabismic amblyopia by small-sized concentric gratings in preverbal children.用小尺寸同心光栅评估学语前儿童的斜视性弱视。
Eye (Lond). 2008 Sep;22(9):1110-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702853. Epub 2007 May 4.
3
[Objective vernier acuity testing in adults, children and infants. Possibilities and limits of a new method].[成人、儿童及婴儿的客观视敏度测试。一种新方法的可能性与局限性]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1994 Feb;204(2):98-104. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1035505.
4
[Determining visual acuity with LH symbols and Landolt rings].[使用LH符号和兰多尔特环测定视力]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1999 Aug;215(2):86-90. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1034677.
5
[Landolt C and snellen e acuity: differences in strabismus amblyopia?].[兰多尔特C视力表和斯内伦视力表:斜视性弱视中的差异?]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2006 Jan;223(1):24-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-858613.
6
Preliminary report: examination of young children with Lea symbols.初步报告:使用利氏符号对幼儿进行检查。
Strabismus. 2000 Sep;8(3):209-13.
7
[Amblyopia: reading speed in comparison with visual acuity for gratings, single Landolt Cs and series Landolt Cs].[弱视:与光栅、单个兰道环和系列兰道环的视力相比的阅读速度]
Fortschr Ophthalmol. 1990;87(5):500-3.
8
[Comparison of visual acuity measured using Landolt-C and ETDRS charts in healthy subjects and patients with various eye diseases].[使用Landolt-C视力表和ETDRS视力表测量健康受试者及各种眼病患者视力的比较]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2011 Oct;228(10):864-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1281758. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
9
Preferential looking acuity obtained with a staircase procedure in pediatric patients.采用阶梯程序在儿科患者中获得的优先注视视力。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1982 Oct;23(4):538-43.
10
Preferential looking grating acuities of infants at risk of amblyopia.弱视风险婴儿的优先注视光栅视力
Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K (1962). 1985;104 ( Pt 8):903-11.

引用本文的文献

1
A new specialized visual acuity chart for amblyopic children aged 3-5 years old: development and its clinical applications.一种适用于3至5岁弱视儿童的新型专用视力表:研制及其临床应用
Int J Ophthalmol. 2013 Dec 18;6(6):844-50. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2013.06.18. eCollection 2013.
2
Examination of young children with Lea symbols.使用利阿符号对幼儿进行检查。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2002 May;86(5):513-6. doi: 10.1136/bjo.86.5.513.