• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一个用于精神病学价值核算的综合系统。

A comprehensive system for value accounting in psychiatry.

作者信息

Butler S F, Docherty J P

机构信息

Innovative Training Systems, Inc., Newton, MA 02158, USA.

出版信息

J Ment Health Adm. 1996 Fall;23(4):479-91. doi: 10.1007/BF02521031.

DOI:10.1007/BF02521031
PMID:8965060
Abstract

This article describes a clinical management tool, the Value Accounting System, developed for use by a national organization of psychiatric treatment facilities. The system integrates patient case-mix variables with data on services provided, key administrative and clinical processes, clinical effectiveness, and cost/price. A comprehensive database links critical quality information with fiscal information, yielding a management tool that is national in scope, standardized, and versatile enough (1) to address general questions of the effectiveness and value of psychiatric services and (2) to provide an empirical base for rational, clinical management decision making. Descriptive data are presented from an attempt to establish a database and implement the system. The management and scientific potential of the Value Accounting System to improve the quality and efficiency of mental health services are discussed.

摘要

本文介绍了一种临床管理工具——价值核算系统,该系统是为一家全国性精神治疗机构组织开发的。该系统将患者病例组合变量与所提供服务的数据、关键行政和临床流程、临床疗效以及成本/价格整合在一起。一个综合数据库将关键质量信息与财务信息相链接,产生了一个具有全国范围、标准化且通用性强的管理工具,足以(1)解决精神科服务有效性和价值的一般性问题,以及(2)为合理的临床管理决策提供实证依据。文中呈现了为建立数据库并实施该系统所做尝试的描述性数据。还讨论了价值核算系统在提高心理健康服务质量和效率方面的管理及科学潜力。

相似文献

1
A comprehensive system for value accounting in psychiatry.一个用于精神病学价值核算的综合系统。
J Ment Health Adm. 1996 Fall;23(4):479-91. doi: 10.1007/BF02521031.
2
Quality as the driving force for cost-effective psychiatric managed care.质量作为具有成本效益的精神科管理式医疗的驱动力。
J Healthc Qual. 1996 Jan-Feb;18(1):4-8; quiz 8, 44. doi: 10.1111/j.1945-1474.1996.tb00816.x.
3
A Medicaid mental health carveout program: the Massachusetts experience.一项医疗补助心理健康专项计划:马萨诸塞州的经验
Manag Care Q. 1996 Summer;4(3):85-92.
4
Managing care for mental illness: paradox and pitfalls.管理精神疾病护理:悖论与陷阱
Manag Care Q. 1996 Summer;4(3):93-9.
5
Pushing the quality envelope: a new outcomes management system.
Psychiatr Serv. 2001 Jul;52(7):925-34. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.52.7.925.
6
Perspectives. Medicaid population challenges managed behavioral care.观点。医疗补助计划人群给行为管理式医疗带来挑战。
Faulkner Grays Med Health. 1996 Oct 7;50(39):suppl 1-4.
7
Managing care with outcome data: new hopes, new responsibilities.利用结果数据管理医疗护理:新希望,新责任。
Behav Healthc Tomorrow. 1998 Jun;7(3):20-4, 40.
8
The Wal-Marting of American psychiatry: an ethnography of psychiatric practice in the late 20th century.
Cult Med Psychiatry. 2001 Dec;25(4):427-39; discussion 467-72. doi: 10.1023/a:1013063216716.
9
Dialogue. The rush to measure outcomes: help or hazard? Can health services research have a role in managed care?对话。急于衡量结果:是助力还是危害?卫生服务研究在管理式医疗中能发挥作用吗?
Behav Healthc Tomorrow. 1995 May-Jun;4(3):40-2.
10
Cost containment versus quality of care.成本控制与医疗质量
Behav Healthc Tomorrow. 1997 Jun;6(3):88, 87.

引用本文的文献

1
Managing smarter: a decision support system for mental health providers.更智能的管理:面向心理健康服务提供者的决策支持系统。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 1998 Nov;25(4):446-55. doi: 10.1007/BF02287514.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of patient satisfaction: development and refinement of a service evaluation questionnaire.患者满意度评估:服务评价问卷的开发与完善
Eval Program Plann. 1983;6(3-4):299-313. doi: 10.1016/0149-7189(83)90010-1.
2
Strengths, uses and problems of global scales as an evaluation instrument.
Eval Program Plann. 1980;3(4):257-68. doi: 10.1016/0149-7189(80)90041-5.
3
Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: development of a general scale.客户/患者满意度评估:通用量表的编制
Eval Program Plann. 1979;2(3):197-207. doi: 10.1016/0149-7189(79)90094-6.
4
The impact of private utilization management on psychiatric care: a review of the literature.
J Ment Health Adm. 1992 Summer;19(2):143-57. doi: 10.1007/BF02521315.
5
Outcomes for adult outpatients with depression under prepaid or fee-for-service financing.预付费或按服务收费模式下成年抑郁症门诊患者的治疗结果。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993 Jul;50(7):517-25. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820190019003.
6
Clients' satisfaction survey in a psychiatric inpatient population attached to a general hospital.综合医院精神科住院患者的满意度调查
Can J Psychiatry. 1986 Mar;31(2):123-8. doi: 10.1177/070674378603100209.
7
The mental health care revolution. Will psychology survive?
Am Psychol. 1989 Apr;44(4):703-8. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.44.4.703.
8
The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.医学结局研究36项简明健康调查(SF-36)。I.概念框架与条目选择。
Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83.
9
The global assessment scale. A procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbance.全球评估量表。一种测量精神障碍总体严重程度的程序。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1976 Jun;33(6):766-71. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1976.01770060086012.