Studd J W, MacCarthy K, Zamblera D, Dain M P
Chelsea & Westminster Hospital, London, UK.
Scand J Rheumatol Suppl. 1996;103:89-90. doi: 10.3109/03009749609103759.
Thirty-two (32) menopausal women were entered into the study (16 in each treatment group), of whom 24 completed the study. The objectives were to compare the long-term efficacy and the local and systemic tolerance of Menorest and Premarin in the control of menopausal symptoms, and the prevention of bone loss. After a 4-week treatment-free run-in period, patients were treated with continuous estrogen therapy (a twice weekly application with Menorest 50 or a daily oral administration of Premarin 0.625 mg) for one year. Patients were also given 20 mg oral Dydrogesterone per day for the last 12 days of each 28 day cycle of treatment. The main efficacy criterion was the reduction in the mean number of hot flushes per day at 12 months compared to baseline. This study was also considered as a pilot study to collect data on changes in the bone mineral density of the lumbar spine (L1-L4) assessments from baseline to week 30 and week 56. Menorest and Premarin were equally effective in the relief of menopausal symptoms over the 1-year period of treatment. The mean number of hot flushes per day decreased from 6.9 at baseline to 0.5 at 12 weeks and 0.1 at 12 months in the Menorest group, and from 7.0 to 0.3 and 0.0 in the Premarin group. Regarding the lumbar spine and hip densitometry results, Menorest prevented bone loss to the same extent as Premarin. This data confirms the positive action of estrogen, with oral in addition to transdermal administration on both trabecular and cortical BMD over 1 year of treatment. Tolerance was similar, with approximately the same number of patients with AEs, severe AEs and related to study drug AEs in both groups. There was one serious AE (breast carcinoma) diagnosed after 6-months of treatment. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy was initiated prior to surgery. According to the investigator it was not related to study drug and must have been present prior to study start. Menorest 50 and Premarin 0.625 were equally effective over the 1-year treatment period in reducing the mean number of hot flushes and the severity score of menopausal symptoms, including vasomotor, psychological and urogenital symptoms.
32名绝经后女性参与了该研究(每个治疗组16名),其中24名完成了研究。目的是比较美诺孕(Menorest)和倍美力(Premarin)在控制绝经症状及预防骨质流失方面的长期疗效、局部和全身耐受性。经过4周的无治疗导入期后,患者接受持续雌激素治疗(每周两次应用50μg美诺孕或每日口服0.625mg倍美力),为期一年。在每个28天治疗周期的最后12天,患者每天还口服20mg地屈孕酮。主要疗效标准是与基线相比,12个月时每日潮热平均次数的减少。本研究也被视为一项试点研究,以收集从基线到第30周和第56周腰椎(L1-L4)骨密度评估变化的数据。在1年的治疗期内,美诺孕和倍美力在缓解绝经症状方面同样有效。美诺孕组每日潮热平均次数从基线时的6.9次降至12周时的0.5次和12个月时的0.1次,倍美力组从7.0次降至0.3次和0.0次。关于腰椎和髋部骨密度测量结果,美诺孕预防骨质流失的程度与倍美力相同。该数据证实了雌激素在1年治疗期内对小梁骨和皮质骨骨密度的积极作用,包括口服和经皮给药。耐受性相似,两组中出现不良事件(AE)、严重AE以及与研究药物相关AE的患者数量大致相同。治疗6个月后诊断出1例严重AE(乳腺癌)。在手术前开始了化疗和放疗。根据研究者的判断,这与研究药物无关,肯定在研究开始前就已存在。在1年的治疗期内,50μg美诺孕和0.625mg倍美力在减少潮热平均次数和绝经症状严重程度评分(包括血管舒缩、心理和泌尿生殖系统症状)方面同样有效。