[Age-related correlation between EEG parameters and depth of anesthesia under propofol. Effect of fentanyl].

UNLABELLED

This study was designed to determine the relationship between the electroencephalogram (EEG) and clinical signs of depth of anaesthesia during induction of anaesthesia by slow infusion of propofol (18 mg/kg.h).

METHODS

Four groups of 12 patients each were studied (groups I and II: 18-50 years; groups III and IV: > 70 years). Groups II and IV were given 0.15 mg fentanyl before the infusion of propofol was started. The clinical signs recorded were: (1) loss of eyelash reflex; (2) respiratory insufficiency; (3) tolerance to painful stimuli; and (4) intubation. Cardiovascular reactions were documented. The dosage was calculated from the infusion time (time from start of infusion until specific clinical event). Bipolar electrodes were placed at the C4/P4 positions (10-20 placement system) to record the EEG, which was processed by a personal computer (Narkograph) using fast-fourier transformation. The Narkograph calculates multiparametric EEG stages ranging from A to F (according to Kugler) as well as median frequency and spectral-edge frequency 95% (SEF). Stage A represents alpha rhythm, stage F is equivalent to a burst suppression pattern. For statistical analysis a Student t-test was performed.

RESULTS

The infusion of propofol led to slowly developing anaesthesia with loss of eyelash reflex followed by loss of pain response, respiratory insufficiency, and intubation. In the younger patients the clinical signs coincided with well-differentiable EEG patterns. Above 70 years of age there were problems in distinguishing the EEG patterns, as there are alterations of the EEG with advanced age. The multiparametric EEG stage calculated by the Narkograph showed a better correlation with the clinical signs than median or SEF. Fentanyl shortened the induction time remarkably: less propofol was needed to achieve corresponding clinical signs when fentanyl was added. The EEG patterns typical for a specific clinical condition remained unchanged by fentanyl. Similar clinical situations showed equal EEG stages in all groups. Different clinical situations could be distinguished by significant changes in the EEG. The infusion times for tolerance to pain and respiratory insufficiency were not significantly different, and there were no significant differences between the EEG patterns and propofol doses for these two clinical parameters. Intubation was performed after 18.5 +/- 4.6 min in group I with a propofol dose of 5.6 +/- 1.4 mg/kg. This time was shortened by fentanyl in group II to 10.1 +/- 3.7 min and a propofol dose of 3.0 +/- 1.1 mg/kg.

CONCLUSION

Different clinical signs corresponding to different levels of depth of anaesthesia could be differentiated by their EEG parameters. The EEG stage allowed better differentiation of the clinical conditions than the single-parameter EEG derivatives median and SEF. The results of this study show that EEG monitoring provides information about depth of anaesthesia.