• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床试验的荟萃分析:消费者指南

Meta-analysis of clinical trials: a consumer's guide.

作者信息

Geller N L, Proschan M

机构信息

Office of Biostatistics Research, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, Rockledge Centre 2, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-7938, USA.

出版信息

J Biopharm Stat. 1996 Nov;6(4):377-94. doi: 10.1080/10543409608835151.

DOI:10.1080/10543409608835151
PMID:8969975
Abstract

Meta-analysis is a popular statistical tool allowing the synthesis of related research studies in a quantitative manner. Components of a good meta-analysis are first discussed, with a view toward critical reading of reports of meta-analyses. Examples include lipid-lowering drugs and coronary artery bypass graft surgery. A role for meta-analysis in the design and monitoring of clinical trials was examined at a workshop held at the National Institutes of Health and aspects of these uses of meta-analyses are considered. Basic analytical and graphical methods of meta-analysis are briefly reviewed. The goal is to encourage more thoughtful evaluation of the many meta-analyses that are published or are presented.

摘要

荟萃分析是一种常用的统计工具,它能够以定量的方式综合相关的研究。本文首先讨论了高质量荟萃分析的组成部分,旨在批判性地阅读荟萃分析报告。实例包括降脂药物和冠状动脉搭桥手术。在国立卫生研究院举办的一次研讨会上,探讨了荟萃分析在临床试验设计和监测中的作用,并对荟萃分析的这些应用方面进行了考量。本文简要回顾了荟萃分析的基本分析方法和图形方法。目的是鼓励对已发表或展示的众多荟萃分析进行更深入的评估。

相似文献

1
Meta-analysis of clinical trials: a consumer's guide.临床试验的荟萃分析:消费者指南
J Biopharm Stat. 1996 Nov;6(4):377-94. doi: 10.1080/10543409608835151.
2
Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.基于证据的医学、系统评价以及介入性疼痛管理指南:第6部分。观察性研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Pain Physician. 2009 Sep-Oct;12(5):819-50.
3
Issues in the meta-analysis of cluster randomized trials.整群随机试验的Meta分析中的问题。
Stat Med. 2002 Oct 15;21(19):2971-80. doi: 10.1002/sim.1301.
4
Assessing the reporting and scientific quality of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials of treatments for anxiety disorders.评估焦虑症治疗随机对照试验的Meta分析的报告质量和科学质量。
Ann Pharmacother. 2008 Oct;42(10):1402-9. doi: 10.1345/aph.1L204. Epub 2008 Sep 2.
5
Critical reading of the meta-analysis of clinical trials.对临床试验荟萃分析的批判性阅读。
Therapie. 1995 Jul-Aug;50(4):339-51.
6
[Evaluation of the pediatric aspects of the WHO document and meta-analysis of immunotherapy].[世界卫生组织文件儿科方面的评估及免疫疗法的荟萃分析]
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2000 May-Jun;28(3):82-9.
7
A primer in meta-analysis for the plastic surgeon.整形外科医生的荟萃分析入门
Ann Plast Surg. 2010 Apr;64(4):506-9. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181b95059.
8
A practical guide to meta-analysis.荟萃分析实用指南。
J Hand Surg Am. 2006 Dec;31(10):1671-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.09.002.
9
Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.干预措施的荟萃分析除了纳入随机对照试验外,是否还应包括观察性研究?对基本原理的批判性审视。
Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Nov 15;166(10):1203-9. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm189. Epub 2007 Aug 21.
10
Discrepancies between meta-analyses and subsequent large randomized, controlled trials.荟萃分析与随后的大型随机对照试验之间的差异。
N Engl J Med. 1997 Aug 21;337(8):536-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199708213370806.

引用本文的文献

1
Toward a comprehensive evidence map of overview of systematic review methods: paper 2-risk of bias assessment; synthesis, presentation and summary of the findings; and assessment of the certainty of the evidence.迈向全面的系统评价方法概述证据图谱:第 2 部分——偏倚风险评估;研究结果的综合、呈现和总结;以及证据确定性评估。
Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 12;7(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0784-8.
2
Clinical trials registries are underused in the pregnancy and childbirth literature: a systematic review of the top 20 journals.临床试验注册在妊娠和分娩文献中的应用不足:对排名前20的期刊的系统评价
BMC Res Notes. 2016 Oct 21;9(1):475. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2280-3.
3
Associations between rs965513/rs944289 and papillary thyroid carcinoma risk: a meta-analysis.
rs965513/rs944289与甲状腺乳头状癌风险之间的关联:一项荟萃分析。
Endocrine. 2014 Nov;47(2):428-34. doi: 10.1007/s12020-014-0256-4. Epub 2014 Apr 11.