Byng J W, Boyd N F, Little L, Lockwood G, Fishell E, Jong R A, Yaffe M J
Department of Medical Biophysics and Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Eur J Cancer Prev. 1996 Oct;5(5):319-27. doi: 10.1097/00008469-199610000-00003.
Mammographic parenchymal patterns are among the strongest indicators of the risk of developing breast cancer. Risk evaluation through breast patterns may have an important role in studies of the aetiology of breast cancer and for monitoring changes in the breast in evaluating potential risk-modifying interventions. Typically, patterns are assessed by an experienced radiologist according to Wolfe grade, or on a coarse quantitative scale according to percent density. Parenchymal characterization methods, to overcome variability of classification by human observer, are under investigation. These include image segmentation using semi-automatic thresholding and automatic classification through textural and density measures. An important practical question relates to the extent to which information about mammographic pattern is carried by any one of the four views obtained in a typical examination. Specifically, variations of right-left breast symmetry and variations between the two standard views of each breast were tested. The mammograms of 30 premenopausal women, comprising 90 images [30 each of the right cranial-caudal (RCC), left cranial-caudal (LCC) and right medial-lateral oblique (RMLO)] were evaluated. Parameters included both subjective (radiologist classification and interactive image thresholding) and objective (fractal and skewness indices) quantitative measurements of parenchymal pattern. For the parameters tested, a high degree of correlations was observed for measurements on the RCC, LCC and RMLO views. Pearson correlation coefficients between 0.86-0.96 were found for the comparisons of quantitative parameters. The strong correlations suggest that, in the study and application of mammographic density classification, representative information is provided in a single view.
乳腺钼靶实质模式是患乳腺癌风险最强的指标之一。通过乳腺模式进行风险评估在乳腺癌病因学研究以及评估潜在风险修正干预措施时监测乳腺变化方面可能具有重要作用。通常,模式由经验丰富的放射科医生根据沃尔夫分级进行评估,或者根据密度百分比在粗略的定量尺度上进行评估。为克服人类观察者分类的变异性,正在研究实质特征化方法。这些方法包括使用半自动阈值化的图像分割以及通过纹理和密度测量进行自动分类。一个重要的实际问题涉及在典型检查中获得的四个视图中的任何一个所携带的关于乳腺钼靶模式信息的程度。具体而言,测试了左右乳腺对称性的变化以及每个乳腺两个标准视图之间的差异。对30名绝经前女性的乳腺钼靶片进行了评估,共90幅图像[右头尾位(RCC)、左头尾位(LCC)和右内外斜位(RMLO)各30幅]。参数包括对实质模式的主观(放射科医生分类和交互式图像阈值化)和客观(分形和偏度指数)定量测量。对于所测试的参数,在RCC、LCC和RMLO视图上的测量结果观察到高度相关性。定量参数比较的皮尔逊相关系数在0.86 - 0.96之间。强烈的相关性表明,在乳腺钼靶密度分类研究和应用中,单个视图可提供代表性信息。