Krause M, Brado M, Schosser R, Bartsch F R, Gerneth M, Kauffmann G
Department of Radiodiagnostics, Radiological Clinic, University of Heidelberg, Germany.
Eur Radiol. 1996;6(6):932-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00240711.
An international multicenter study (Germany, Sweden, and Switzerland) was performed to investigate the feasibility and diagnostic reliability of standard video-conferencing (VC) technology for remote expert consultation in radiology. Three high-spatial-resolution films (hand-bone, mammography, chest) and two low-spatial-resolution image sets (liver CT and MRI) were studied (total 446 images taken from different examinations). The images were recorded by a video camera, transmitted via public broadband networks, and displayed on a video monitor. The resolution of the recorded images varied from 2.4 lp/mm to 4.8 lp/mm at maximum zoom. After 3-4 months, the images were reexamined using conventional light-box reading. Diagnostic reliability was evaluated by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. With video conferencing, there was a noticeable loss of diagnostic accuracy for the high-spatial-resolution films, whereas for liver CT and liver MRI images VC reading seemed to be satisfactory (average area value difference < 0.02).
一项国际多中心研究(德国、瑞典和瑞士)开展,以调查标准视频会议(VC)技术用于放射学远程专家会诊的可行性和诊断可靠性。研究了三张高空间分辨率影像(手部骨骼、乳腺摄影、胸部)和两组低空间分辨率图像集(肝脏CT和MRI)(共446张取自不同检查的图像)。图像由摄像机记录,通过公共宽带网络传输,并显示在视频监视器上。记录图像的分辨率在最大缩放时从2.4 lp/mm到4.8 lp/mm不等。3至4个月后,使用传统灯箱阅片法对图像进行重新检查。通过受试者操作特征(ROC)分析评估诊断可靠性。对于视频会议,高空间分辨率影像的诊断准确性有明显损失,而对于肝脏CT和肝脏MRI图像,视频会议阅片似乎令人满意(平均面积值差异<0.02)。