Avendanio B, Frederiksen N L, Benson B W, Sokolowski T W
Baylor College of Dentistry, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1996 Dec;82(6):713-9. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(96)80448-3.
Studies of the effectiveness of commonly used imaging techniques have shown that they are less than optimal in revealing oral disease. The diagnostic accuracy of detailed narrow beam radiography (scanography) has been reported to be significantly better than intraoral periapical radiography for the observation of periodontal pathoses and at least as good as periapical radiography for detecting periapical lesions. The purpose of this study was to calculate and compare the effective doses and risk estimates from the use of detailed narrow beam radiography and intraoral radiography. With the use of a tissue equivalent human phantom and thermoluminescent dosimetry, the effective dose from detailed narrow beam radiography was found to vary from 5 to 35 microSv depending on the anatomic location of the image layer and intraoral radiography from 9 to 150 microSv depending on the type of survey. Effective doses of these magnitudes represent 0.6 to 18.8 days of equivalent natural radiation exposure and a probability for stochastic effects on the order of 0.37 to 10.95 x 10(-6).
对常用成像技术有效性的研究表明,它们在揭示口腔疾病方面并非最佳。据报道,对于观察牙周病变,详细窄束射线摄影(扫描摄影)的诊断准确性明显优于口内根尖片,而在检测根尖周病变方面至少与根尖片一样好。本研究的目的是计算并比较使用详细窄束射线摄影和口内摄影的有效剂量和风险估计。通过使用组织等效人体模型和热释光剂量测定法,发现详细窄束射线摄影的有效剂量根据图像层的解剖位置在5至35微希沃特之间变化,口内摄影的有效剂量根据检查类型在9至150微希沃特之间变化。这些量级的有效剂量相当于0.6至18.8天的等效自然辐射暴露,以及约0.37至10.95×10⁻⁶的随机效应概率。