Suppr超能文献

[轻度至中度高胆固醇血症的饮食治疗。不同干预措施的有效性]

[Dietary treatment of mild to moderate hypercholesterolemia. Effectiveness of different interventions].

作者信息

Gosselin P, Verreault R, Gaudreault C, Guillemette J

机构信息

Département de Médecine sociale et préventive, Université Laval.

出版信息

Can Fam Physician. 1996 Nov;42:2160-7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of brief dietary intervention by family physicians in their daily practice and in group sessions to standard dietetic treatment in mild to moderate hypercholesterolemia. DESIGN: Randomised clinical trial. SETTING: Family practice clinic in a remote community. PARTICIPANTS: Between September 1, 1991 and September 30, 1992, 135 men and women between 20 and 60 years old with mild to moderate hypercholesterolemia were recruited and randomly assigned to three treatment groups to be taught the American Heart Association low fat diet. Each participant had an LDL-C reading higher than the desirable level set by the Canadian Consensus Conference on Cholesterol. INTERVENTIONS: The three treatment groups received different interventions: individual consultations with a family physician in his office (phase I); group sessions with a physician and a dietician (phase II); and individual consultations with a dietician (phase II). Participants were followed for 6 months with visits and blood tests every 2 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reduction in serum levels of total cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C, and triglycerides was measured after 2, 4, and 6 months of dietary treatment. Changes in risk factors (smoking, weight, level of physical activity) and patients' cholesterol/saturated fat index were also measured. RESULTS: Ninety-nine subjects completed the 6-month regimen. The mean reduction in serum LDL-C was 0.08 mmol/L (1.8%) in Group I, 0.07 mmol/L (1.6%) in Group II, and 0.28 mmol/L (6.3%) in Group III (P = 0.94). An LDL-C reduction of 10% or more relative to initial level was observed in 27% of participants in Group I and approximately 40% of subjects in the other two groups (P = 0.41). Counseling resulted in a decrease in body weight, smoking, and dietary fat consumption and an increase in physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment by a dietician achieved better results and should remain the standard. Physicians should focus on the detection and control of other heart disease risk factors.

摘要

目的

比较家庭医生在日常诊疗中进行的简短饮食干预及小组干预与标准饮食治疗对轻至中度高胆固醇血症的疗效。

设计

随机临床试验。

地点

一个偏远社区的家庭诊疗所。

参与者

在1991年9月1日至1992年9月30日期间,招募了135名年龄在20至60岁之间的轻至中度高胆固醇血症男女,并随机分配到三个治疗组,接受美国心脏协会低脂饮食教育。每位参与者的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)读数均高于加拿大胆固醇共识会议设定的理想水平。

干预措施

三个治疗组接受不同干预:在家庭医生办公室进行个体咨询(第一阶段);由医生和营养师进行小组干预(第二阶段);以及由营养师进行个体咨询(第三阶段)。对参与者进行为期6个月的随访,每2个月进行一次问诊和血液检测。

主要观察指标

在饮食治疗2、4和6个月后,测量血清总胆固醇、LDL-C、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)和甘油三酯水平的降低情况。还测量了危险因素(吸烟、体重、身体活动水平)的变化以及患者的胆固醇/饱和脂肪指数。

结果

99名受试者完成了6个月的疗程。第一组血清LDL-C的平均降低值为0.08 mmol/L(1.8%),第二组为0.07 mmol/L(1.6%),第三组为0.28 mmol/L(6.3%)(P = 0.94)。相对于初始水平,第一组27%的参与者LDL-C降低了10%或更多,其他两组约40%的受试者有此降低幅度(P = 0.41)。咨询导致体重、吸烟和饮食脂肪摄入量减少,身体活动增加。

结论

营养师治疗取得了更好的效果,应仍是标准治疗方式。医生应专注于其他心脏病危险因素的检测和控制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验