Gast R J, Ledee D R, Fuerst P A, Byers T J
Department of Molecular Genetics, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210-1292, USA.
J Eukaryot Microbiol. 1996 Nov-Dec;43(6):498-504. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1996.tb04510.x.
Classification of Acanthamoeba at the subgenus level has been problematic, but increasing reports of Acanthamoeba as an opportunistic human pathogen have generated an interest in finding a more consistent basis for classification. Thus, we are developing a classification scheme based on RNA gene sequences. This first report is based on analysis of complete sequences of nuclear small ribosomal subunit RNA genes (Rns) from 18 strains. Sequence variation was localized in 12 highly variable regions. Four distinct sequence types were identified based on parsimony and distance analyses. Three were obtained from single strains: Type T1 from Acanthamoeba castellanii V006, T2 from Acanthamoeba palestinensis Reich, and T3 from Acanthamoeba griffini S-7. T4, the fourth sequence type, included 15 isolates classified as A. castellanii, Acanthamoeba polyphaga, Acanthamoeba rhysodes or Acanthamoeba sp., and included all 10 Acanthamoeba keratitis isolates. Interstrain sequence differences within T4 were 0%-4.3%, whereas differences among sequence types were 6%-12%. Branching orders obtained by parsimony and distance analyses were inconsistent with the current classification of T4 strains and provided further evidence of a need to reevaluate criteria for classification in this genus. Based on this report and others in preparation, we propose that Rns sequence types provide the consistent quantititive basis for classification that is needed.
棘阿米巴在亚属水平上的分类一直存在问题,但随着越来越多关于棘阿米巴作为人类机会性病原体的报道,人们开始有兴趣寻找一个更一致的分类基础。因此,我们正在开发一种基于RNA基因序列的分类方案。本首次报告基于对18个菌株的核小核糖体亚基RNA基因(Rns)完整序列的分析。序列变异定位在12个高度可变区域。基于简约分析和距离分析确定了四种不同的序列类型。三种来自单个菌株:T1型来自卡氏棘阿米巴V006,T2型来自巴勒斯坦棘阿米巴Reich,T3型来自格里芬棘阿米巴S-7。第四种序列类型T4包括15株被分类为卡氏棘阿米巴、多食棘阿米巴、里斯德棘阿米巴或棘阿米巴属的分离株,并且包括所有10株棘阿米巴角膜炎分离株。T4内菌株间的序列差异为0%-4.3%,而序列类型之间的差异为6%-12%。通过简约分析和距离分析获得的分支顺序与T4菌株的当前分类不一致,并提供了进一步的证据表明需要重新评估该属的分类标准。基于本报告及其他正在准备中的报告,我们建议Rns序列类型为所需的分类提供一致的定量基础。