Stothard D R, Schroeder-Diedrich J M, Awwad M H, Gast R J, Ledee D R, Rodriguez-Zaragoza S, Dean C L, Fuerst P A, Byers T J
Department of Molecular Genetics, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210-1292, USA.
J Eukaryot Microbiol. 1998 Jan-Feb;45(1):45-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1998.tb05068.x.
The 18S rRNA gene (Rns) phylogeny of Acanthamoeba is being investigated as a basis for improvements in the nomenclature and taxonomy of the genus. We previously analyzed Rns sequences from 18 isolates from morphological groups 2 and 3 and found that they fell into four distinct evolutionary lineages we called sequence types T1-T4. Here, we analyzed sequences from 53 isolates representing 16 species and including 35 new strains. Eight additional lineages (sequence types T5-T12) were identified. Four of the 12 sequence types included strains from more than one nominal species. Thus, sequence types could be equated with species in some cases or with complexes of closely related species in others. The largest complex, sequence type T4, which contained six closely related nominal species, included 24 of 25 keratitis isolates. Rns sequence variation was insufficient for full phylogenetic resolution of branching orders within this complex, but the mixing of species observed at terminal nodes confirmed that traditional classification of isolates has been inconsistent. One solution to this problem would be to equate sequence types and single species. Alternatively, additional molecular information will be required to reliably differentiate species within the complexes. Three sequence types of morphological group 1 species represented the earliest divergence in the history of the genus and, based on their genetic distinctiveness, are candidates for reclassification as one or more novel genera.
棘阿米巴属的18S rRNA基因(Rns)系统发育正在作为该属命名法和分类学改进的基础进行研究。我们之前分析了来自形态学组2和3的18个分离株的Rns序列,发现它们分为四个不同的进化谱系,我们称之为序列类型T1 - T4。在这里,我们分析了代表16个物种的53个分离株的序列,其中包括35个新菌株。又鉴定出另外八个谱系(序列类型T5 - T12)。12个序列类型中的四个包含来自多个命名物种的菌株。因此,序列类型在某些情况下可以等同于物种,而在其他情况下可以等同于密切相关物种的复合体。最大的复合体,序列类型T4,包含六个密切相关的命名物种,25个角膜炎分离株中有24个属于该复合体。Rns序列变异不足以完全解析该复合体内分支顺序的系统发育,但在末端节点观察到的物种混合证实了分离株的传统分类一直不一致。解决这个问题的一个办法是将序列类型与单一物种等同起来。或者,将需要额外的分子信息来可靠地区分复合体内的物种。形态学组1物种的三个序列类型代表了该属历史上最早的分歧,基于它们的遗传独特性,有可能被重新分类为一个或多个新属。