• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

局部用左卡巴斯汀和奈多罗米钠对变应原结膜激发试验早期反应的效果比较。

Comparison of effects of topical levocabastine and nedocromil sodium on the early response in a conjunctival provocation test with allergen.

作者信息

Hammann C, Kämmerer R, Gerber M, Spertini F

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1996 Dec;98(6 Pt 1):1045-50. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(96)80189-8.

DOI:10.1016/s0091-6749(96)80189-8
PMID:8977503
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multiple ocular challenges or seasonal trials have demonstrated the efficacy of levocabastine and nedocromil sodium in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis.

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to compare the protective effect of levocabastine eye drops with that of nedocromil in a conjunctival provocation test with allergen.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients with allergic conjunctivitis to grass pollen were recruited. After a preliminary provocation to determine conjunctival reaction threshold (erythema of at least 50% of the conjunctiva with ocular itching), patients were randomized to receive either topical levocabastine (0.05%) or nedocromil (2%) 15 minutes before provocation. Erythema and pruritus intensity were recorded at each concentration of allergen up to the reaction threshold.

RESULTS

The allergen concentration level necessary to reach reaction threshold was increased (p < 0.001) after treatment with both drugs. Comparison between screening and each treatment indicated that the shift in allergen concentration was significantly greater after levocabastine treatment than after nedocromil treatment (p = 0.019). Conjunctival itching (symptom score) and erythema (percent conjunctival surface) were also better controlled by levocabastine than by nedocromil during provocation (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In a provocation test with allergen, levocabastine and nedocromil were both effective in increasing the conjunctival tolerance to allergen, with better protection provided by levocabastine.

摘要

背景

多项眼部挑战试验或季节性试验已证明左卡巴斯汀和奈多罗米钠在治疗过敏性结膜炎方面的疗效。

目的

本研究旨在比较在过敏原结膜激发试验中左卡巴斯汀滴眼液与奈多罗米的保护作用。

方法

招募了24名对草花粉过敏的过敏性结膜炎患者。在进行初步激发试验以确定结膜反应阈值(结膜至少50%出现红斑并伴有眼部瘙痒)后,患者被随机分为两组,在激发试验前15分钟分别局部使用左卡巴斯汀(0.05%)或奈多罗米(2%)。记录每种过敏原浓度直至反应阈值时的红斑和瘙痒强度。

结果

两种药物治疗后达到反应阈值所需的过敏原浓度水平均升高(p < 0.001)。筛查与每种治疗方法之间的比较表明,左卡巴斯汀治疗后过敏原浓度的变化显著大于奈多罗米治疗后(p = 0.019)。在激发试验期间,左卡巴斯汀对结膜瘙痒(症状评分)和红斑(结膜表面百分比)的控制也优于奈多罗米(p < 0.05)。

结论

在过敏原激发试验中,左卡巴斯汀和奈多罗米均能有效提高结膜对过敏原的耐受性,左卡巴斯汀提供的保护效果更好。

相似文献

1
Comparison of effects of topical levocabastine and nedocromil sodium on the early response in a conjunctival provocation test with allergen.局部用左卡巴斯汀和奈多罗米钠对变应原结膜激发试验早期反应的效果比较。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1996 Dec;98(6 Pt 1):1045-50. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(96)80189-8.
2
Nedocromil sodium and levocabastine reduce the symptoms of conjunctival allergen challenge by different mechanisms.奈多罗米钠和左卡巴斯汀通过不同机制减轻结膜过敏原激发试验的症状。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001 Sep;108(3):449-54. doi: 10.1067/mai.2001.117591.
3
Emedastine ophthalmic solution 0.05% versus levocabastine ophthalmic suspension 0.05% in the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis using the conjunctival allergen challenge model.使用结膜过敏原激发模型,比较0.05%依美斯汀眼药水与0.05%左卡巴斯汀眼用混悬液治疗过敏性结膜炎的效果。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2000 Dec;130(6):717-23. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(00)00689-9.
4
Effect of levocabastine, a new H1 antagonist, in a conjunctival provocation test with allergens.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1988 Oct;82(4):590-4. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(88)90969-4.
5
Comparative efficacy of olopatadine 0.1% ophthalmic solution versus levocabastine 0.05% ophthalmic suspension using the conjunctival allergen challenge model.使用结膜过敏原激发模型比较0.1%奥洛他定滴眼液与0.05%左卡巴斯汀眼用混悬液的疗效
Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Dec;20(12):1953-8. doi: 10.1185/030079904X5724.
6
[Comparison of three antiallergic eyedrops in a specific conjunctival provocation test: mequitazine, levocabastine and dexamethasone].
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2005 Mar;28(3):244-50. doi: 10.1016/s0181-5512(05)81050-2.
7
Effect of a new selective H1 receptor antagonist (levocabastine) in a nasal and conjunctival provocation test.一种新型选择性H1受体拮抗剂(左卡巴斯汀)在鼻腔和结膜激发试验中的作用。
Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1987;82(3-4):541-3. doi: 10.1159/000234274.
8
Efficacy of levocabastine hydrochloride ophthalmic suspension in the conjunctival allergen challenge test in Japanese subjects with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.盐酸左卡巴斯汀眼用混悬液在日本季节性过敏性结膜炎患者结膜过敏原激发试验中的疗效。
Allergol Int. 2006 Jun;55(2):157-65. doi: 10.2332/allergolint.55.157.
9
Effect of antihistamine eye drops on the conjunctival provocation test with Japanese cedar pollen allergen.抗组胺眼药水对日本雪松花粉过敏原结膜激发试验的影响。
Allergol Int. 2006 Dec;55(4):373-8. doi: 10.2332/allergolint.55.373.
10
Topical levocabastine protects better than sodium cromoglycate and placebo in conjunctival provocation tests.在结膜激发试验中,局部应用左卡巴斯汀比色甘酸钠和安慰剂的保护作用更好。
Allergy. 1990 Jan;45(1):18-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1990.tb01079.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Topical treatments for seasonal allergic conjunctivitis: systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and effectiveness.季节性变应性结膜炎的局部治疗:疗效和有效性的系统评价与荟萃分析
Br J Gen Pract. 2004 Jun;54(503):451-6.
2
Ocular allergy guidelines: a practical treatment algorithm.眼部过敏指南:实用治疗方案
Drugs. 2002;62(11):1611-34. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200262110-00004.