Stovner L J
Department of Neurology, Trondheim University Hospital, Norway.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Dec 1;21(23):2735-46. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199612010-00006.
Empirical studies concerning the whiplash syndrome are reviewed from the point of view of epidemiologic methodology.
To assess the nosologic status of the whiplash syndrome.
Although a large number of studies concerning the syndrome exist, there is still controversy concerning the existence of the syndrome.
The manner in which each study contributes to the validity of the syndrome is determined on the basis of the methodologic design (descriptive, case-control, cohort, and intervention/experimental) of the study.
Whereas the face validity of the syndrome is excellent, the descriptive, construct, and predictive validity are rather poor. In particular, convincing empirical evidence for a causal link (construct validity) between the trauma mechanism and chronic symptoms is sparse.
Carefully conducted studies designed to assess the degree to which head and nec trauma contribute to the development of chronic pain, particularly head and neck pain, are urgently needed.
从流行病学方法的角度对有关挥鞭样综合征的实证研究进行综述。
评估挥鞭样综合征的疾病分类状况。
尽管存在大量关于该综合征的研究,但对于该综合征的存在仍存在争议。
根据研究的方法学设计(描述性、病例对照、队列研究以及干预/实验性研究)来确定每项研究对该综合征有效性的贡献方式。
该综合征的表面效度极佳,但其描述效度、结构效度和预测效度相当差。特别是,关于创伤机制与慢性症状之间因果联系(结构效度)的令人信服的实证证据很少。
迫切需要精心设计的研究来评估头部和颈部创伤在慢性疼痛,尤其是头颈部疼痛发展过程中的作用程度。