• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自我内部的稳定性:自我差异理论结构影响的纵向研究。

Stability within the self: a longitudinal study of the structural implications of self-discrepancy theory.

作者信息

Strauman T J

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin-Madison 53719-1179, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Dec;71(6):1142-53. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.71.6.1142.

DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.71.6.1142
PMID:8979383
Abstract

Self-discrepancy theory emphasizes the emotional significance of patterns of relations between the self-concept and ideal and ought self-guides and predicts stability within the self related to structural characteristics independent of specific self-beliefs. It was hypothesized that whereas participants' specific self-descriptions would vary substantially over time, magnitude of self-discrepancy, regulatory focus (the individual's dominant self-guide domain), and other structural features would be stable. Participants (N = 47) were recruited from 2 samples that had completed a self-belief interview and a childhood memory cued-recall task 3 years earlier (T. J. Strauman, 1990). As expected, participants' self-descriptions varied, but magnitude and type of self-discrepancy, associations between self-guide domains and childhood memories, and correlates of regulatory focus were stable.

摘要

自我差异理论强调自我概念与理想自我及应该自我导向之间关系模式的情感意义,并预测与特定自我信念无关的结构特征相关的自我内部稳定性。研究假设,尽管参与者的具体自我描述会随时间大幅变化,但自我差异的程度、调节焦点(个体的主导自我导向领域)和其他结构特征将保持稳定。参与者(N = 47)从两个样本中招募,这两个样本在三年前(T. J. 施特劳曼,1990年)完成了一次自我信念访谈和一项童年记忆线索回忆任务。正如预期的那样,参与者的自我描述各不相同,但自我差异的程度和类型、自我导向领域与童年记忆之间的关联以及调节焦点的相关因素是稳定的。

相似文献

1
Stability within the self: a longitudinal study of the structural implications of self-discrepancy theory.自我内部的稳定性:自我差异理论结构影响的纵向研究。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Dec;71(6):1142-53. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.71.6.1142.
2
Self-guides, autobiographical memory, and anxiety and dysphoria: toward a cognitive model of vulnerability to emotional distress.自我引导、自传体记忆与焦虑和烦躁不安:构建易受情绪困扰的认知模型
J Abnorm Psychol. 1992 Feb;101(1):87-95. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.101.1.87.
3
Self-discrepancy theory as a transdiagnostic framework: A meta-analysis of self-discrepancy and psychopathology.自我差异理论作为一种跨诊断框架:自我差异与精神病理学的元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2019 Apr;145(4):372-389. doi: 10.1037/bul0000186. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
4
Changing the working self alters the emotions prompted by recall.改变工作自我会改变回忆引发的情绪。
Memory. 2015;23(2):254-67. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2014.882956. Epub 2014 Feb 7.
5
Emotions experienced at event recall and the self: Implications for the regulation of self-esteem, self-continuity and meaningfulness.事件回忆与自我中体验到的情绪:对自尊、自我连续性和意义感调节的启示。
Memory. 2016;24(5):577-91. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2015.1031678. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
6
Self-awareness and the emotional consequences of self-discrepancies.自我意识与自我差异的情感后果。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 May;31(5):703-13. doi: 10.1177/0146167204271559.
7
Self-related problems beyond the self-concept: motivational consequences of discrepant self-guides.自我概念之外的自我相关问题:不一致的自我引导的动机后果。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Oct;55(4):625-33. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.55.4.625.
8
Self-discrepancies and emotional vulnerability: how magnitude, accessibility, and type of discrepancy influence affect.自我差异与情绪易感性:差异的大小、可及性和类型如何影响情感。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Jul;51(1):5-15. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.1.5.
9
Memory perspective and self-concept in social anxiety: an exploratory study.社交焦虑中的记忆视角与自我概念:一项探索性研究。
Memory. 2004 Jul;12(4):489-95. doi: 10.1080/09658210444000098.
10
Episodic memory in adults with autistic spectrum disorders: recall for self- versus other-experienced events.患有自闭症谱系障碍的成年人的情景记忆:对自我经历与他人经历事件的回忆。
Res Dev Disabil. 2007 May-Jun;28(3):317-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2006.03.003. Epub 2006 Jul 12.

引用本文的文献

1
The process of reacquiring new vocalization in total laryngectomy patients with head and neck cancer: A qualitative study.头颈部癌全喉切除术患者重新获得新发声的过程:一项定性研究。
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2023 Dec 13;11(3):100362. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2023.100362. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Focus meets motivation: When regulatory focus aligns with approach/avoidance motivation in creative processes.焦点与动机相遇:在创造性过程中,调节焦点与趋近/回避动机相一致时。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 30;13:807875. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.807875. eCollection 2022.
3
Customizing Your Demons: Anxiety Reduction via Anthropomorphizing and Destroying an "Anxiety Avatar".
定制你的恶魔:通过将“焦虑化身”拟人化并摧毁它来减轻焦虑
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 3;11:566682. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566682. eCollection 2020.
4
A Multi-Functional View of Moral Disengagement: Exploring the Effects of Learning the Consequences.道德脱离的多功能视角:探究学习后果的影响
Front Psychol. 2018 Jan 26;8:2286. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02286. eCollection 2017.
5
Reprint of ''Using neuroimaging to individualize TMS treatment for depression: Toward a new paradigm for imaging-guided intervention''.《利用神经影像学实现抑郁症经颅磁刺激治疗个体化:迈向影像引导干预的新范式》重印版
Neuroimage. 2017 May 1;151:65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.049.
6
Disinhibition of negative true self for identity reconstructions in cyberspace: Advancing self-discrepancy theory for virtual setting.网络空间中身份重构的消极真实自我去抑制:推进虚拟环境下的自我差异理论
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 11;12(4):e0175623. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175623. eCollection 2017.
7
Using neuroimaging to individualize TMS treatment for depression: Toward a new paradigm for imaging-guided intervention.利用神经成像技术实现抑郁症经颅磁刺激治疗的个体化:迈向影像引导干预的新范式。
Neuroimage. 2017 Mar 1;148:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.083. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
8
Individual differences in regulatory focus predict neural response to reward.调节焦点的个体差异可预测对奖励的神经反应。
Soc Neurosci. 2017 Aug;12(4):419-429. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2016.1178170. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
9
Self-regulatory theory and weight-loss maintenance.自我调节理论与体重维持
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2015 Mar;22(1):54-63. doi: 10.1007/s10880-015-9421-z.
10
Genetic moderation of the association between regulatory focus and reward responsiveness: a proof-of-concept study.调节焦点与奖励反应性之间关联的基因调节作用:一项概念验证研究。
Biol Mood Anxiety Disord. 2013 Feb 1;3(1):3. doi: 10.1186/2045-5380-3-3.