• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Ten years of experiences from a participatory community-based injury prevention program in Motala, Sweden.

作者信息

Lindqvist K, Timpka T, Schelp L

机构信息

Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Sweden.

出版信息

Public Health. 1996 Nov;110(6):339-46. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3506(96)80005-9.

DOI:10.1016/s0033-3506(96)80005-9
PMID:8979749
Abstract

Exploratory studies in the Scandinavian countries have suggested that the national cost of unintentional injuries is equal to 4% of the Gross National Product (GNP). One way for Swedish society to handle this situation has been through community-based injury prevention programs. This study used action research methods to supplement the understanding of the community development for injury prevention. The aim of this paper is to present the participative model used in one of the first of these programs, the Motala Injury Prevention Program, and lessons learned from the first 10 years of its operation. The program 'succeeded' in 1993, when Motala Municipality formed a regular Safety Board chaired by the Municipal Commissioner. These are five main messages from the initial phases of the program: a community-based injury prevention program has to be regarded as a long-term project; preferably over more than a 10 year period, economic calculations are important in the community analysis phase of the program, inter-linkage between community organizations is essential in the design phase, the hand-over from the initial program developers to practitioners is critical in the implementation phase, it is important to maintain a high-quality data collection routine even after the conclusion of the community analysis phase of the program. These observations have a potential to be valid at least for Northern Europe, which, by comparison with other parts of the world is a relatively homogenous area with regard to external causes of injuries. Regarding other communities, there are known differences in injury rates and community organization.

摘要

相似文献

1
Ten years of experiences from a participatory community-based injury prevention program in Motala, Sweden.
Public Health. 1996 Nov;110(6):339-46. doi: 10.1016/s0033-3506(96)80005-9.
2
The WHO safe community program for injury prevention: evaluation of the impact on injury severity.世界卫生组织预防伤害安全社区项目:对伤害严重程度影响的评估
Public Health. 1998 Nov;112(6):385-91. doi: 10.1038/sj.ph.1900505.
3
A cost-benefit analysis of the community-based injury prevention programme in Motala, Sweden--a WHO Safe Community.瑞典莫塔拉市(世界卫生组织认可的安全社区)基于社区的伤害预防项目成本效益分析。
Public Health. 2001 Sep;115(5):317-22. doi: 10.1038/sj.ph.1900793.
4
Motala Municipality - a sustainable Safe Community in Sweden.莫塔拉市——瑞典的一个可持续安全社区。
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2012;19(3):249-59. doi: 10.1080/17457300.2012.692692. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
5
Evaluation of a child safety program based on the WHO safe community model.基于世界卫生组织安全社区模型的儿童安全项目评估。
Inj Prev. 2002 Mar;8(1):23-6. doi: 10.1136/ip.8.1.23.
6
The impact of child safety promotion on different social strata in a WHO Safe Community.儿童安全促进对世界卫生组织安全社区中不同社会阶层的影响。
J Inj Violence Res. 2012 Jan;4(1):20-5. doi: 10.5249/jivr.v4i1.83. Epub 2011 Apr 16.
7
Safe communities for children: insight from a pilot program for preventing unintentional injuries.儿童安全社区:预防意外伤害试点项目的见解
Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2009 Apr-Jun;21(2):187-95. doi: 10.1515/ijamh.2009.21.2.187.
8
Can a community development model be used for health programmes in an industrialized country?
Int J Health Plann Manage. 1991 Jul-Sep;6(3):209-19. doi: 10.1002/hpm.4740060305.
9
Association between childhood community safety interventions and hospital injury records: a multilevel study.儿童社区安全干预措施与医院伤害记录之间的关联:一项多层次研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 Sep;57(9):724-9. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.9.724.
10
[Safe community].[安全社区]
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2005 Nov;81(5 Suppl):S137-45. doi: 10.2223/JPED.1401.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward osteoporosis: a questionnaire survey.对骨质疏松症的认知、态度和行为:一项问卷调查
Front Public Health. 2025 Sep 15;13:1621402. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1621402. eCollection 2025.
2
The impact of child safety promotion on different social strata in a WHO Safe Community.儿童安全促进对世界卫生组织安全社区中不同社会阶层的影响。
J Inj Violence Res. 2012 Jan;4(1):20-5. doi: 10.5249/jivr.v4i1.83. Epub 2011 Apr 16.
3
The 'WHO Safe Communities' model for the prevention of injury in whole populations.
世界卫生组织“安全社区”模式用于预防全体人群的伤害。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8;2009(3):CD004445. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004445.pub3.
4
What promotes sustainability in Safe Community programmes?什么促进了安全社区项目的可持续性?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Jan 8;9:4. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-4.
5
Impact of a community-based osteoporosis and fall prevention program on fracture incidence.一项基于社区的骨质疏松症与跌倒预防项目对骨折发生率的影响。
Osteoporos Int. 2005 Jun;16(6):700-6. doi: 10.1007/s00198-004-1732-0. Epub 2004 Sep 30.
6
All-terrain vehicle injury in children: strategies for prevention.儿童全地形车伤害:预防策略
Inj Prev. 2004 Oct;10(5):303-7. doi: 10.1136/ip.2003.004176.
7
What makes community based injury prevention work? In search of evidence of effectiveness.什么因素能使基于社区的伤害预防工作发挥作用?探寻有效性证据。
Inj Prev. 2004 Oct;10(5):268-74. doi: 10.1136/ip.2004.005744.
8
Evaluation of a child safety program based on the WHO safe community model.基于世界卫生组织安全社区模型的儿童安全项目评估。
Inj Prev. 2002 Mar;8(1):23-6. doi: 10.1136/ip.8.1.23.
9
Evidence based prevention of acute injuries during physical exercise in a WHO safe community.世界卫生组织安全社区中基于证据的体育锻炼期间急性损伤预防
Br J Sports Med. 2001 Feb;35(1):20-7. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.35.1.20.
10
Introducing the theme in a qualitative interview using a visual starter.
J Med Syst. 1999 Dec;23(6):437-46. doi: 10.1023/a:1020564830618.