den Hollander J G, Horrevorts A M, van Goor M L, Verbrugh H A, Mouton J W
Department of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Therapy, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997 Jan;41(1):95-100. doi: 10.1128/AAC.41.1.95.
Synergism between two antibiotics is usually tested by a checkerboard titration technique, or by time-kill methods. Both methods have the disadvantage that synergism is determined at constant concentrations of the antibiotics, which do not reflect reality in vivo. In the present study we determined whether synergism between tobramycin and ceftazidime can be found at declining concentrations below the MIC, and whether change in dosing sequence of the antibiotics would result in differences in killing. Three monotherapy and six combination therapy schedules were tested in an in vitro pharmacokinetic model, using a Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistant to both antibiotics. During all q8h dosing schedules the peak concentration (Cmax) was adjusted to the MIC for the strain of both antibiotics. During all monotherapy regimens bacterial growth was present, while all six combination therapy schedules showed significant killing. At t = 24 h there were no differences between all combination therapy schedules, but at t = 8 h the two combination therapy schedules with administration of tobramycin once daily showed a significantly faster killing. By using the area under the killing curve (AUKC) as a parameter for synergistic killing, simultaneous combination therapy starting with tobramycin once daily was significantly better than all other regimens. We conclude that there is synergism between tobramycin and ceftazidime at declining antibiotic concentrations below the MIC, resulting in a pronounced killing of a resistant Pseudomonas strain. Infections due to resistant Pseudomonas strains could possibly be treated by a synergistic combination of these drugs.
两种抗生素之间的协同作用通常通过棋盘滴定技术或时间杀菌法来检测。这两种方法都有一个缺点,即协同作用是在抗生素浓度恒定的情况下确定的,而这并不能反映体内的实际情况。在本研究中,我们确定了在低于最低抑菌浓度(MIC)的浓度下降时,妥布霉素和头孢他啶之间是否能发现协同作用,以及抗生素给药顺序的改变是否会导致杀菌效果的差异。使用对这两种抗生素均耐药的铜绿假单胞菌,在体外药代动力学模型中测试了三种单一疗法和六种联合疗法方案。在所有每8小时给药方案中,将峰值浓度(Cmax)调整为两种抗生素对该菌株的MIC。在所有单一疗法方案中均有细菌生长,而所有六种联合疗法方案均显示出显著的杀菌效果。在t = 24小时时,所有联合疗法方案之间没有差异,但在t = 8小时时,每日给药一次妥布霉素的两种联合疗法方案显示出明显更快的杀菌速度。以杀菌曲线下面积(AUKC)作为协同杀菌的参数,每日一次开始使用妥布霉素的同步联合疗法明显优于所有其他方案。我们得出结论,在低于MIC的抗生素浓度下降时,妥布霉素和头孢他啶之间存在协同作用,导致对耐药铜绿假单胞菌菌株有显著的杀灭作用。由耐药铜绿假单胞菌菌株引起的感染可能可以通过这两种药物的协同组合来治疗。