Beyer C E, Ogletree R J, Ritzel D O, Drolet J C, Gilbert S L, Brown D
Dept. of Health Education, North Carolina Central University, Durham 27707, USA.
J Sch Health. 1996 Dec;66(10):361-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.1996.tb03393.x.
A content analysis instrument was developed to examine differences in gender representation in sexuality education curricula. Fourteen middle school and high school curricula, published between 1985 and 1995, were examined. Variables included illustrations, noun/pronoun usage, and specific topics within the two categories of biological function and mutual interest. The study examined differences in gender representation in illustrations, photographs, cartoons, drawings, and text. Omission of sexuality topics related to gender also was examined. Little difference occurred within the text of the curricula in noun and pronoun usage. Illustrations were few in number, but showed greater female representation. Greater male representation occurred in topics related to drug use, sexual exploitation, sexual desire, and homosexuality. Topics with greater female representation included body image, diseases of the reproductive organs, and hygiene.
开发了一种内容分析工具，以研究性教育课程中性别呈现的差异。研究了1985年至1995年间出版的14种初中和高中课程。变量包括插图、名词/代词的使用，以及生物功能和共同兴趣这两类中的具体主题。该研究考察了插图、照片、卡通、绘图和文本中性别呈现的差异。还研究了与性别相关的性话题的遗漏情况。课程文本在名词和代词的使用上差异不大。插图数量较少，但女性形象的呈现更多。在与吸毒、性剥削、性欲和同性恋相关的主题中，男性形象的呈现更多。女性形象呈现较多的主题包括身体形象、生殖器官疾病和卫生。
