• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

屠宰场卫生评估与英国牛肉胴体微生物污染的相关性

Relevance of abattoir hygiene assessment to microbial contamination of British beef carcases.

作者信息

Hudson W R, Mead G C, Hinton M H

机构信息

Division of Food Animal Science, University of Bristol, Langford.

出版信息

Vet Rec. 1996 Dec 14;139(24):587-9.

PMID:8981733
Abstract

Eleven beef abattoirs were visited, each on five separate occasions. On each occasion, an audit was carried out according to the official Hygiene Assessment System (HAS) and 10 carcases were sampled at four different sites to assess total viable counts and counts of presumptive coliform bacteria. The HAS scores ranged from 11 to 84 (maximum 100), and the logarithmic mean total viable counts for all sampling sites on each batch of carcases varied between 1.98 and 4.14 colony forming units/cm2. The mean prevalence of coliform contamination ranged from 0 to 85 per cent. There was a significant negative correlation (P < 0.001) between the mean HAS scores and the mean total viable count for each abattoir, but not between the HAS scores and the numbers of coliforms. Within the HAS, the mean scores for all five categories, before weighting, showed a significant correlation with the mean total viable count (P < 0.001); however, the categories concerned with slaughter and dressing, and personnel and practices were of most value in determining trends in carcase contamination. A new advisory classification is proposed for levels of microbial contamination on beef carcases.

摘要

研究人员走访了11家牛肉屠宰场,每家屠宰场各走访5次。每次走访时,均依据官方卫生评估系统(HAS)进行审核,并在4个不同部位采集10具牛胴体样本,以评估总活菌数和推测性大肠菌群数。HAS评分范围为11至84(满分100),每批牛胴体所有采样部位的对数平均总活菌数在1.98至4.14菌落形成单位/平方厘米之间。大肠菌群污染的平均发生率在0%至85%之间。各屠宰场的平均HAS评分与平均总活菌数之间存在显著负相关(P < 0.001),但HAS评分与大肠菌群数之间不存在显著相关性。在HAS系统中,加权前所有五个类别的平均评分与平均总活菌数均呈现显著相关性(P < 0.001);然而,与屠宰、修整以及人员和操作相关的类别在确定牛胴体污染趋势方面最具价值。本文提出了一种针对牛肉胴体微生物污染水平的新的咨询分类方法。

相似文献

1
Relevance of abattoir hygiene assessment to microbial contamination of British beef carcases.屠宰场卫生评估与英国牛肉胴体微生物污染的相关性
Vet Rec. 1996 Dec 14;139(24):587-9.
2
Microbiological sampling of swine carcasses: a comparison of data obtained by swabbing with medical gauze and data collected routinely by excision at Swedish abattoirs.猪胴体的微生物采样:瑞典屠宰场用医用纱布擦拭获得的数据与常规切除采集的数据比较
Int J Food Microbiol. 2007 Sep 15;118(2):180-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.07.009. Epub 2007 Jul 21.
3
Microbial contamination on beef in relation to hygiene assessment based on criteria used in EU Decision 2001/471/EC.基于欧盟第2001/471/EC号决定所使用标准的牛肉微生物污染与卫生评估的关系
Int J Food Microbiol. 2004 Apr 15;92(2):217-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2003.09.010.
4
[A study on the bacteriological aspect of fresh beef. I. Effect of the slaughter of cattle (author's transl)].[新鲜牛肉细菌学研究。I. 牛屠宰的影响(作者译)]
Tijdschr Diergeneeskd. 1976 Jun 1;101(11):587-93.
5
Microbiological carcass sampling methods to achieve compliance with 2001/471/EC and new hygiene regulations.实现符合2001/471/EC及新卫生法规要求的微生物胴体采样方法。
Res Microbiol. 2005 Jan-Feb;156(1):104-6. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2004.08.007.
6
[The use of neck skin for microbial process control of fresh poultry meat using the bioluminescence method].[利用颈部皮肤通过生物发光法对新鲜禽肉进行微生物过程控制]
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2004 May;111(5):181-4.
7
Microbial contamination on beef and sheep carcases in South Australia.南澳大利亚牛肉和羊肉胴体上的微生物污染。
Int J Food Microbiol. 2003 Mar 25;81(3):255-60. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1605(02)00220-9.
8
Use of routine beef carcase Escherichia coli monitoring data to investigate the relationship between hygiene status of incoming stock and processing efficacy.
Int J Food Microbiol. 2006 Oct 1;111(3):263-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.05.006. Epub 2006 Sep 1.
9
Comparison of aerial counts at different sites in beef and sheep abattoirs and the relationship between aerial and beef carcass contamination.比较不同地点在牛和羊屠宰场的空中计数和空中与牛肉胴体污染之间的关系。
Food Microbiol. 2012 Dec;32(2):325-31. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2012.07.008. Epub 2012 Aug 8.
10
Guidelines for bacterial counts on carcases at Cato Ridge abattoir.卡托岭屠宰场 carcasses 的细菌计数指南。 (注:carcasses 常见释义为“屠体”“畜体”等,这里根据语境可理解为“ carcasses ”指的是动物尸体,翻译为“ carcasses ”更符合专业语境。) 原句中“ carcases ”拼写有误,正确拼写应为“ carcasses ” 。 最终译文:卡托岭屠宰场畜体细菌计数指南。
J S Afr Vet Assoc. 1985 Jun;56(2):99-100.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Microbiological Contamination and Prevalence of Pathogenic Strains in Cattle Carcasses from Romanian Slaughterhouses.罗马尼亚屠宰场牛胴体微生物污染及致病菌株流行情况评估
Pathogens. 2025 Mar 3;14(3):248. doi: 10.3390/pathogens14030248.
2
Microbial Contamination and Meat Handling Practices in Hawassa City Butcher Shops, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚哈瓦萨市肉店的微生物污染与肉类处理 practices(这个词原英文有误,正确可能是practices)
Environ Health Insights. 2024 Oct 28;18:11786302241293289. doi: 10.1177/11786302241293289. eCollection 2024.